1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20 kp (9999) - Woodstock, Georgia, USA - MAY 11, 2008
UPDATED: MAY 23, 2008 Name: Busch NA
Date: 05/10/2008
Mode: Bottle
Source: Tasting, Cellar Party
Appearance: clear gold, wispy white head, streaks of drippy lace,
Aroma: sweet cereal aroma with a slightly decaying grain character,
Body: body is a bit thin,
Flavor: sweet cereal flavor, lots of green apple, light bitterness, light moldy character like wet grain that has been sitting too long,
Aroma: 2/10; Appearance: 4/10; Flavor: 2/10; Palate: 3/10; Overall: 4/20
Rating: 1.2/5.0 Drinkability: 3/10
Score: -/4
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20 argo0 (9034) - Washington DC, USA - APR 17, 2004
(can) Clear apple juice body with medium white head. Aroma is faint, corn, mild sweet, artificial, slightly soured milk. Taste is minimal -- medium sweet corn, finishing with an unpleasant "filling without substance" feeling. Very light body. I cannot imagine a worthier beer for #2000 -- thanks so much Dan.
1.7 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20 jcwattsrugger (8685) - Florida and, New Jersey, USA - JUN 14, 2008
12oz can-pours a disappearing white head and yellow color. Aroma is grain with slight sweetness, spice. Taste is grain with slight sweetness, spice, thin/watery. Nothing bad, just not much of anything.
0.6 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20 hopscotch (7274) - Vero Beach, Florida, USA - APR 24, 2004
Seltzer water. Turn your back on this one! Thanks to Argo0 for the sample.
0.9 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20 chriso (7062) - London, Greater London, ENGLAND - OCT 1, 2006
Can at RBSG Grand Tasting, July 2006. The aroma is truly vile. I won’t attempt to describe all the nasty elements. The flavour is somewhat better in that it is entirely absent. Tap water has more body and flavour than this. At least I won’t have to drink it again. And I’ve got my low alcohol beer tick back again - the previous one, whatever it was, that I tried specifically to cross off the style must have been reclassified.
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20 Tmoney99 (6885) - Cincinnati, Ohio, USA - NOV 8, 2006
Can from Krogers. Clear pale color with a minimal frothy white head that mostly diminished with fair lacing. Light grainy hop aroma. Light body with a watery texture and soft carbonation. Medium sweet flavor with a light sweet finish of short duration. My expectations where met.
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20 3fourths (6215) - Boulder, Colorado, USA - JUL 23, 2006
UPDATED: MAR 31, 2009 So this is the supposed worst beer on RateBeer? I’ve had a lot worse, mostly brewpubs that put nothing less than an abortion of a beer on tap. See... the more ingridients you add to a beer, I believe the worse off it could possibly become. Therefore, if you don’t put a lot into a beer, like Busch NA, I don’t see how it can really taste so damn awful. The Lost Lake I had the other night was worse than this. Now, I’m not saying this is anything great, no way. The nose is still pretty putrid, full of straw, corn, and fuel (butane). Frothy, fizzy, pale, thin, oily, tastes a little bit like celery. Bad, but not the worst. That title belongs to Molson 0.5 and the Groggs beers (all of them).
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20 DocLock (5776) - Lower Pottsgrove, Pennsylvania, USA - APR 9, 2004
This is just Busch beer witout the alcohol. The only time I ever drank this was in a dry titty bar, and I paid 3 bucks for a bottle. Just another reason to hate Augie Busch.
|