hainer (19) - New York, USA - SEP 3, 2011
2.6 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Pours cloudy but with nice heads. Emits a nice aroma. Thatís where the fun ends. Actually, the initial tongue contact is quite pleasant, but the aftertaste soon turns odd with its ginger (and cinnamon?) spices. The malty taste also overstays its welcome. I guess itís a fun beer to throw in the mix, but every once in a blue moon is probably enough.
adamelb (5) - Schenectady, New York, USA - MAY 19, 2013 does not count
4 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 17/20
Always surprised how low Butternuts beers are rated. As a fan of ginger I found this beer a refreshing light bodied pale ale. Somewhat traditional in a sense there are no bold flavors but rather a good balance of lighter flavors. The dominating flavor is certainly ginger which hits after a small dose of pale malt, yeast and a pleasing carbonation roll across the tongue. This is a go to pale ale when Iím looking for a session brew at a fair price.
Blairgus (1751) - California, USA - MAY 7, 2013
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
7 Apr 2013, can. yellow, clear, no bubbles, thin frothy head. nose is bready, some butter or butterscotch. med/thin body and moderately fizzy. has a bitter grassy hop character with bready malt and faint butter notes. not a fan.
jmcgavin12 (165) - Madison, USA - MAY 1, 2013
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Darkish amber pour with lots of malty notes on the nose. A bit of crisp citrus complements the sweet tones. A very refreshing beer and overall very enjoyable happy hour beer
trapped (332) - TURKEY - APR 16, 2013
2.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Can. Very entertaining packaging (!), light amber color, very little hops aroma, fizzy, sweetish taste, long bitter finish. A bit weak for a pale ale.
Imaena (846) - Atlanta, Georgia, USA - APR 14, 2013
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Can. I am not against cans - just bad beer for the $. Plain and simple.
georgekillian (344) - Alabama, USA - APR 6, 2013
3.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Really funny name and can. good for collectors. This is also a very decent beer with a nice spicy finish. I tasted some earthy herbs and some grass in the finish. A reddish yellow pour and a pretty decent session beer
skokott (32) - Brooklyn, New York, USA - MAR 29, 2013
0.9 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
Itís inexpensive and crisply carbonated and it contains alcohol. It can be slammed back cold.
On the downside not much flavor or body yet at the sametime not as drinkable as Budweiser
jcweaver (697) - VA Beach, Virginia, USA - MAR 17, 2013
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Can. Pours hazy amber with a small, off-white head. Light nose of caramel and grain notes. Bland flavor of light caramel, grain and light grass/hay hops. Thin and bland.
leah2974 (445) - Georgia, USA - FEB 19, 2013
3.4 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Cloudy orange with thin head. Candy and citrus rind aroma. Moderate carbonation. Some bitterness and a dry finish.
HeistAlmighty (816) - Saint John, New Brunswick, CANADA - FEB 17, 2013
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
355ml can. Orange/amber pour, not completely filtered, small white head. Light fruit, apple and mild hops aroma. Taste was mild herbal tea with a very mild earthy hops finish. Body is watery and creamy. Overall, it will do. I guess.