JorisPPattyn (9133) - Ursel, BELGIUM - APR 28, 2005
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Clear pale gold; good fluffy yellowish-white head. Vegetable, very grassy nose, hay, greenmalt. Mainly sweet pilsnermalt taste, again a bit grassy, very grainy. Finishes bit tart-metallic, even harsh. Quite refreshing, light bodied, fizzy MF. WTH is this relabled pilsner doing in Australia?
madquacker (1096) - Canberra ACT, AUSTRALIA - FEB 18, 2005
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Labelling suggested this was a trappist beer but was more like a sweetish cornish malty lager brew of a sort difficult to categorise. Was bizarre. Very chewy and grainy and not watery. Plenty of floaters added to its strangeness. A beer from another dimension. Something different but not great. Not sure would buy another.
highlandlad (1463) - Blue Mountains, AUSTRALIA - FEB 10, 2005
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Humdrum lager from a real hit-and-miss Belgian brewer. Lager gold colour, with some sedimentation and a short head. The nose has some citric hops. The palate is thin and quenching. Some sweetness and then nutty bitterness in the finish. Passable lager but unremarkable. (Bottle)
BTetlow (7) - BALLARAT, AUSTRALIA - DEC 29, 2004 does not count
1.7 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
UPDATED: APR 10, 2009 Very pale in colour and quite cloudy (in the bits floating in it kind of way)
Tastes a little like its stuck between styles lager/Trappist Ale, and failed on both.
Too sweet for a lager and not challenging enough for a Trappist.
Definately quite watery, but the sweetness there was of a very faint bitter orange and honey.
A little too dry on the end.
Bov (11500) - Bienne, SWITZERLAND - OCT 5, 2004
2.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
clear pale golden colour, fine head, modest herbal hoppiness, sweet, light to medium body, the finish is slightly dry and mostly tasteless - unspectacular
vanvenlo (1652) - Glen Iris, AUSTRALIA - AUG 23, 2004
2.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
7 May 2004 - AIBA 2004 - Suphur sweet malt, clear yellow, easy drinking hop flavour, a bit thin and dissapointing.
MartinKubert (862) - Copenhagen, DENMARK - JUN 29, 2004
1.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Quite yeasty and alcoholic flavour. Some sour freshness. Reddish/amber colour. Quite boring and watery.
Hildigöltur (5105) - København, DENMARK - JUN 9, 2004
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
[Draught] Golden coloured. Very boring and weak aroma. The flavour is sweet and bland. Quite thin.
bluevegie (3070) - Perth, AUSTRALIA - JUN 4, 2004
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Pale golden colour, particles floating and a poor lasting head. Plain hop aroma and a boring chewable taste with a faint touch of bitterness.
kook (2033) - Perth, Western Australia, AUSTRALIA - MAR 20, 2004
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Poured clear very light gold with a medium lasting white head. Medium carb. Skunky hop aroma, nothing else really. Thin watery body. Sweet bland taste. Boring!