duff (5484) - Lund, SWEDEN - FEB 6, 2004
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Boring crap. Huyghe suck anyway, and then they go and make this shitty lager. Corny/ricey, sweet-ish malty, dry-ish finish and easy to drink, extremely boring, and very uncompliacted. Why do us Aussies end up with all the crap? This is a pretty pointless beer.
OlJuntan64 (1266) - Perth, AUSTRALIA - FEB 6, 2004
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
MGC under a large medium lasting off white head that makes some lace. Faint stalish woody hops, something lambicky and egg white aroma. Medium soft low carb body. Watery light bitter hops, lightly candy soft drink sweet and a touch of malt at the finish. Is this Huyghe's worst beer? Stick to the ales guys.
eczematic (1306) - Sydney, AUSTRALIA - FEB 1, 2004
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
huyghe leave their distinctive stamp of mediocrity on yet another style, this time a becks-style lager. smells sweetly malty with a faint note of clag, tastes grainy and slightly salty, with a tiny bit of tinny hop at the end. zzzzz
Sully (1377) - Potts Point, New South Wales, AUSTRALIA - JAN 27, 2004
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
The other students on this campus are purportedly ales. This beer pours clean and clear in the glass with a crisp creamy head. There is good lacing in the glass as well so for all intents and purposes it looks good. But then it hit me! The use of that dreaded word 'premium'. Whenever this word is used it is almost mandatory that the beer should be bland and fairly unexciting. Well done Campus, you get A+ for achieving the mediocrity expected.