kook (2033) - Perth, Western Australia, AUSTRALIA - MAR 20, 2004
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Poured clear very light gold with a medium lasting white head. Medium carb. Skunky hop aroma, nothing else really. Thin watery body. Sweet bland taste. Boring!
undercurrent25 (1578) - Barnton, Cheshire, ENGLAND - NOV 19, 2013
2.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
An average light lager with a slight creaminess, nothing special, wouldn’t go back to it
Lunkie (1539) - Glen Iris, AUSTRALIA - MAY 28, 2006
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Murky yellow colour with fair head and lacing. Hop malt aroma with spice. Bitter malt flavour with banana and spice. Fizzy palate.
highlandlad (1434) - Blue Mountains, AUSTRALIA - FEB 10, 2005
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Humdrum lager from a real hit-and-miss Belgian brewer. Lager gold colour, with some sedimentation and a short head. The nose has some citric hops. The palate is thin and quenching. Some sweetness and then nutty bitterness in the finish. Passable lager but unremarkable. (Bottle)
vanvenlo (1396) - Glen Iris, AUSTRALIA - AUG 23, 2004
2.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
7 May 2004 - AIBA 2004 - Suphur sweet malt, clear yellow, easy drinking hop flavour, a bit thin and dissapointing.
Lore (1388) - Budapest, HUNGARY - APR 10, 2013
2.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
pale golden colour, minimal white head; aroma of hops; well ballanced taste of hoppy bitterness and malty sweetness with adequate carbonation; nothing special, but quite drinkable lager
Sully (1377) - Potts Point, New South Wales, AUSTRALIA - JAN 27, 2004
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
The other students on this campus are purportedly ales. This beer pours clean and clear in the glass with a crisp creamy head. There is good lacing in the glass as well so for all intents and purposes it looks good. But then it hit me! The use of that dreaded word 'premium'. Whenever this word is used it is almost mandatory that the beer should be bland and fairly unexciting. Well done Campus, you get A+ for achieving the mediocrity expected.
eczematic (1321) - Adelaide, AUSTRALIA - FEB 1, 2004
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
huyghe leave their distinctive stamp of mediocrity on yet another style, this time a becks-style lager. smells sweetly malty with a faint note of clag, tastes grainy and slightly salty, with a tiny bit of tinny hop at the end. zzzzz
olliejobbins (1281) - Dorking, Surrey, ENGLAND - SEP 26, 2014
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
on tap at delirium cafe. bought for me by an extremely drunk french man. clear yellow with small white head. aroma of very little but sweet faint hops and grass. taste was alright. was hungover when i drank it but it wasn’t offensive. not overly carbonated.
OlJuntan64 (1265) - Perth, AUSTRALIA - FEB 6, 2004
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
MGC under a large medium lasting off white head that makes some lace. Faint stalish woody hops, something lambicky and egg white aroma. Medium soft low carb body. Watery light bitter hops, lightly candy soft drink sweet and a touch of malt at the finish. Is this Huyghe's worst beer? Stick to the ales guys.