jasond567 (1) - Greater London, ENGLAND - JUL 1, 2012 does not count
3.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
Refreshing... easy to drink, lite tasting... just what you need on a hot summers day..
lagerlad (2) - south shields, NEW ZEALAND - OCT 31, 2008 does not count
3.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 17/20
The aroma of the beer is not up to scratch with the other aspects. Carling have done a good job making a good looking beer. The flavour is quite mild but also refreshing and perfect for summer. My overall impression is that this is a good lager which i would easily devour 8 cans.
Leighton (8584) - London, Greater London, ENGLAND - NOV 10, 2010
3.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Bottle. Pours a light, clear yellow with a medium, fizzy white head. Light grain malts in the nose with some dank hops. Lightly sweet with some faint, crisp and earthy hops. Light bodied with fine, fizzy carbonation. Finishes crisp and clean with moderate sweetness and some more of that dank hoppiness. Not overly sweet, which is nice, though the general flavor is lighter than other pale lagers. Not bad.
MustangMarkF (187) - Coventry, West Midlands, ENGLAND - JUL 25, 2012
3.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 14/20
Very widely available in the Uk and can probably be regarded as the standard UK lager. The aroma is typical of a lager, barley notes and gentle hoppiness. Taste can vasry a lot between serving establishments - find a good one (rare in the make a quick buck times we now live in) and it will be full of creamy barley goodness - have a poor one and its metallic pea water. Appearance wise its slightly darker than its north american cousins. A good pint can be refreshing - a bad one is nasty
whoopassmachine (15) - mancland, ENGLAND - FEB 17, 2003
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
This is a good yardstick. Doesn't tend to fluctuate in quality much, a bad pint is drinkable unlike other lagers (Eg. Fosters). One to look for first when approaching the bar - if they don't have anything better (Eg. Carlsberg Export, Bud, Harp), always a good choice. Reasonable out of cans, but unlikely to get you rinsed as a bollock as is not the strongest of contenders for the beer crown.
maupie (926) - Roosendaal, NETHERLANDS - APR 7, 2003
3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
This beer has a yellow body - hue with a no initial flavor and a light body.
MichaelBruch (2184) - Wanne-Eickel, GERMANY - SEP 17, 2012
3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
Bottle shared with McTapps. Pours in golden with simple stable head. Aroma is malty with a but sugar. Tastes very easy but also refreshing. One of the best lager I had in the last 10 days.
dougs (2) - Benson, ENGLAND - SEP 25, 2006 does not count
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
Very easy to drink, not to much action on the palate. A bad pint is terrible, a good pint is average, must be serve well chilled
liinis (1429) - Helsinki, FINLAND - MAY 21, 2013
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
This beer has little difference to others. Quite good for a lager. Nothing special.
vinivini (214) - BELARUS - SEP 12, 2013
2.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Good looking. Light body. Aroma: mostly grassy malt, little hop, a bit metallic. Light sweet taste, watery finish. You get what you expect: a lager to quench thirst. Nothing special but a fair brew without real failures.