MalcolmTucker (513) - - MAY 15, 2012
1 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Low quality lager. Has all the standard pale lager traits: fizzy, flavourless and weak.
Rob_D_UK (185) - Surrey, ENGLAND - MAY 15, 2013
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Pale yellow in colour,no head,aroma is light chemical,taste is watery,thin and gassy. Still do drink it from time to time though, nice and cheap.
scouseassassin (9) - - MAY 15, 2013 does not count
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Had a 440ml can, better from a very cold bottle, highly carbonated, weak, bit of a metallic aftertaste. Ok for a cheap lager watching the footy.
JamesChamp (108) - Oakville, Ontario, CANADA - APR 11, 2013
0.9 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
UPDATED: APR 12, 2013 Weak beer, weak taste, weak alcohol %. But when I was living in England low on money and still wanted to go out for some drinks with friends and get drunk at cheap pub or at a club it was more affordable. Would not drink to actually enjoy the beer but rather to just get drunk on the cheap!
HoppyBudgie (232) - SOLA, NORWAY - MAR 13, 2013
1.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
0,33 l bottle. Weak head than disappears too fast. Ca 1 finger. Nose is boring with some grass and hay. Taste is old corn and hay. Fizzy carbs.
Not a nice beer
Graham77 (86) - Glasgow, SCOTLAND - MAR 1, 2013
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Drank this out of a 440ml can. Pale straw colour. Crumby head. Faint lager malt aroma. Taste was reasonably refreshing. Overall really quite poor. ABV 3.8%
fernandoredf (2) - - JAN 25, 2013 does not count
3.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 16/20
Equilibrada e resfrescante., esta lager de grande distribuição impressiona quando falamos de paladar. Apesar do aroma não ser o forte a Carlsberg pode ser degustada com tranquilidade pelos melhores bebedores de cerveja do mundo
DandyLion (225) - Leicester, Leicestershire, ENGLAND - DEC 31, 2012
2 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Well I might prefer it to fosters. MIGHT. But saying that 98% of beer is better than Fosters. The problem is I think it's not as nice as carling, and giving that 97% of beer is nicer than carling that's not saying much! It tastes of adjuncts. That sweet corn flavour. And I had it from a chilled keg. I have had this at room temperature before and then it's horrible. Does its job though- super chilled lout juice.
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
danlo (350) - Durham, ENGLAND - DEC 24, 2012
1.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 7/20
440ml can, chilled. Pale yellow straw colour, foam white head and a weak malty aroma. Taste is thin, malt with hay notes. Watery mouth feel, gasey.
JohnCook101 (112) - - DEC 8, 2012
1.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
275ml bottle. Pours clear light amber with thin to moderate head. Like most macro European lagers it actually looks pretty good in the glass. Surprisingly decent aroma which promises flavour that just isn’t there. Weak, watery, incredibly bland. Certainly among the worst of European lagers.
Desverger (415) - Copenhagen, DENMARK - DEC 4, 2012
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
(bottle) Pours gold with medium white head, thin body. Aroma is sweet malt.The flavor is sweet malt hardly any hops at all. Mediocre.