1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20 basspro76 (423) - New York, USA - FEB 27, 2010
Sweet, malty grain flavor, very crisp clean finish. Nothing special, but a decent mass produced beer.
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20 Blom (778) - Odense, DENMARK - FEB 24, 2010
Yellow with a fragmented head. Aroma of corn, rice and grass. The flavour is weak with sweet notes of corn and a metallic finish.
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20 Chad9976 (617) - Albany, New York, USA - FEB 14, 2010
Few beers have such nostalgic value to me as Carlsberg. I was first introduced to this beer when I was on active duty in the U.S. Navy and my ship pulled into Copenhagen, Denmark for a liberty port visit. I remember drinking Carlsberg at every bar and restaurant I went, mostly because it was not only the city’s hometown beer, but of all Denmark’s as well. Having visited many other European cities I noticed it was popular and available everywhere I went. I remember thinking it was okay at the time but it didn’t leave much of a long-term impression on me.
Now that I’ve matured as an appreciator of beer I’m able to sit down and analyze Carlsberg for what it really is: the Budweiser of Europe. I don’t mean that as a compliment nor as a criticism, but mostly just a cultural comparison. It’s a drinkable beer with a decent taste but there isn’t anything remarkable about it.
POUR, COLOR AND AROMA
The beer pours smoothly to a clear straw color and forms a well-proportioned, bright white, foamy head which never completely dissipates and leaves significant lacing on the glass. Upon first pouring this beer has a very active amount of carbonation, but as it sits it calms down to the point of being almost completely tepid. This would be normal for a craftier brew like a brown ale or stout, but since Carlsberg is a pilsner it’s quite strange.
The aroma is fairly standard for a beer of the type, but the difference is this beer has a distinctly sweeter scent. It’s just slightly floral and fruity, not just standard malts as most beers of the type.
TASTE
I haven’t tasted Carlsberg in nearly two years but all those memories came rushing back as I drank my first bottle. I remember thinking this beer tasted pretty generic at the time and drinking it now I find that to still be true.
Anyone who’s ever had Budweiser, Miller, or Coors will be familiar with the basic taste of Carlsberg. The difference being this beer is slightly sweeter and doesn’t have the green apple aftertaste of the big American lagers. This is a pilsner after all, so it has a much crisper, cleaner taste than a standard lager.
In fact, the problem with Carlsberg is that it’s so clean it’s bland. There isn’t much of a distinctive flavor noticeable here. It’s a generic beer taste that’s almost watery.
FINISH
I remember drinking a round of Carlsberg with my shipmates and noticing everyone comment to the effect that the beer was easy to drink. This is probably what makes it such a top seller since people will opt for a beer that’s easy to drink over a beer that’s well-flavored.
Carlsberg’s thin taste is complimented by a smooth finish. Had it been even remotely coarse I think this would have been a mediocre beer, but the fact it drinks as if it were water puts it in good standing with most drinkers.
BODY
I don’t know of too many pilsners that are anything other than light in weight. Such beers are intentionally light in body and Carlsberg is no exception. I wasn’t able to confirm the amount of calories per serving, but I would guess it’s fewer than 150. Additionally, at 5% ABV it’s a bit more potent than Americans are used to for this style of beer. But then again this is the type of beer that can and should be accompanied by food so most drinkers probably wouldn’t feel overwhelmed.
FINAL THOUGHTS
I was under the misconception that Carlsberg is considered a fantastic brew on a global scale, but after doing a little research on the internet I realized it’s generally considered average no matter who you ask. I guess it’s that crown on the label that threw me.
NOTE: Watch the video version of this review here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AXzOcGg7LhQ
3.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20 sw (63) - USA - FEB 9, 2010
Aroma-Very light malt based with some slight hay/grass hops.
Appearance-Bright medium dark straw with white frothy head
Flavour-Cereal malt driven with plenty of well rounded bitterness
Mouthfeel-Dry and crisp with out being fresh.
Overall- for the style, this beer meets all criteria without being a stand out.
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20 doubelknv3 (657) - Illinois, USA - FEB 4, 2010
Danish Version:
Sweet malt with mild earth note. Golden with very thin white head and no lacing. Medium sweet malt with mild fruit flavour. Medium bodied lager with mild bitter finish.
2.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20 Vaiz (1847) - Den Haag, NETHERLANDS - FEB 1, 2010
Can at home from local supermarket. ABV 5,5%. Pours a pale golden color with a thick foamy, white head. Corny and slightly malty average lager aroma. A bit grainy watery yet fresh flavor that is actually not quite bad at all. Nothing interesting going on, but that was to be expected from mass market lager.
3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20 Chickencoop (188) - California, USA - JAN 29, 2010
I would have to throw this into the whole euro-lager ring, and based on that, this is a more drinkable beer than most. This is a simple beer, kinda on the lighter side but still good. I wasn’t expecting this to knock me out and it didn’t, but it was smooth and refreshing. You can count on this beer, unlike some of the other euro-lagers.
0.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20 mkel07 (1555) - Brisbane, AUSTRALIA - JAN 29, 2010
330ml bottle. Clearand bright gold colour with a modest white head that is nothing special. Basic malt and grain aromas that do nothing to enhance the experience. Lacks flavour and substance.
|