thewolf (10553) - Kolding, DENMARK - APR 29, 2006
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Very pale colour with limited head. Taste is slightly citric with a hoppy aftertaste. Just not very much of it...
Christian (10364) - Odense, DENMARK - JUL 15, 2003
2.7 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
UPDATED: APR 27, 2008 Yellow with a nice firm head. Well balanced malt and hops aroma, but a little too watery. When blindtasted it’s still my favourite standard Danish lager.
KimJohansen (10341) - Frederiksberg C, DENMARK - JUN 16, 2008
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
UPDATED: MAY 16, 2010 Clear golden with large white creamy head. Sweet fruity aroma with floral hops and caramel notes. Flavor is moderate sweet with fruity and notes leading to a mild Bitter end.
faroeviking (10299) - FAROE ISLANDS - JAN 4, 2007
1.7 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Golden refreshing waterish beer. A typical world pi**y pale lager. Boooring.
Pinball (10214) - Copenhagen, DENMARK - NOV 19, 2008
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
rating#735 (i used to drink this a lot, so forgot to rate it when i started drinking beer).
clear yellow, nice white head,
aroma is mainly your typical macro lager, but i sense a little hops too. flavor is a little sourish, a little hoppy, sweet and faint bitterness in the end. not much taste. reasonable session beer. i sense a little fruit in there??
Maria (9909) - Thisted, DENMARK - DEC 11, 2007
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20
It’s a golden beer with a modest head. The aroma and flavour is weak with light notes of malt and hops and the carbonation is high. Not defensive in any way, just plain boring. In a blind rating between this Hof and Grøn Tuborg, the only difference is that Tuborg has a little more bitterness...
bhensonb (9866) - Woodland, California, USA - DEC 19, 2006
2.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
UPDATED: JAN 7, 2008 Tried again on 01/07/2008. Still seems a bit too sweet, but it is clean, refreshing, and drinkable. //
Light, clean, hoppy aroma. Clear light gold, with substantial white head. Starts with clean light hop, followed by a bit of malt sweetness. Beats Bud.
HenrikSoegaard (9766) - Randers, DENMARK - DEC 10, 2005
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Bottle. Frothy fair mostly deminishing head, OK aroma very malty, watery short finish and way too carbonated. Not a good pale lager.
Tmoney99 (9645) - Cincinnati, Ohio, USA - JAN 31, 2006
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Bottle. Poured clear amber with a small white head that diminished quickly. Light sweet gassy aroma. Medium body. Moderate sweet bitter flavor with a small malt finish of average duration.
bierkoning (9586) - La Tropica, NETHERLANDS - SEP 12, 2002
1.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
Slght maltaroma. Sweetish, bitter, herbal, grassy flavor. Hint of metal.