Holyfrog (5) - AUSTRALIA - JUN 21, 2016 does not count
0.6 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Awful. What an embarrassment.
This should never be representative of Australian Beer.
skunky, soy sauce,
LazyPyro (488) - Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, ENGLAND - FEB 18, 2016
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
375ml bottle. Clear pale yellow piss colour with a thin white head. Aroma is a bit chemically but there’s a slightly sweet malty hop aroma there. Taste is much the same slightly sweet malts but with a chemical aftertaste left in the mouth. Watery feel. Average lager really, far from Australia’s "finest beer".
jmgreenuk (7329) - Kuala Lumpur, MALAYSIA - JAN 30, 2016
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Bottle at the Brussels Beer Café, Jalan P Ramlee, Kuala Lumpur. Poured a crystal clear straw colour with a thin frothy white head. The aroma is malt, light bitter hop. The flavour is moderate to light bitter with a soft hop bitter, dry malt palate. Medium bodied with average carbonation.
kermis (9986) - The Hague, NETHERLANDS - JAN 30, 2016
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Bottle sampled at Brussels Beer Café in KL center. Clear golden with a white head. Aroma of malt, light toffee, grain and light hops. Flavour is above light sweet and light bitter. Light bodied with moderate carbonation.
whoisghost (193) - Perth, AUSTRALIA - DEC 25, 2015
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Very clear pale yellow with a thick, cream coloured head. Cheap malt and straw on the nose, very muted. Slight honey, dry malts, very slight floral hop bitterness. Reasonably creamy finish, well carbonated and dry.
nybol (1364) - DENMARK - OCT 11, 2015
2.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
En ikke alt for stor oplevelse. En meget almindelig pilsner der nu smager godt nok, men meget konsumagtig.
DuffLover (117) - Hoboken, New Jersey, USA - AUG 31, 2015
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
Had to try this on vacation in Australia since the bottle claimed to contain "Australia’s Finest" beer. Apparently Foster’s is just a decoy. Overall not bad for a typical lager.
Wim (3551) - Weelde, BELGIUM - AUG 23, 2015
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
On Holiday gold blond -colored body with a white head and with a malt hops aroma a hop sweet malt taste with a slight bitter finish
nimbleprop (7202) - SouthWest, Washington, Washington DC, USA - JUN 26, 2015
1.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 7/20
Sucked down a bunch of these at an event at the Australian embassy. Pours a clear gold, soft white head. Nose of cheap malt, bad honey, corn syrup, straw. Flavor is sickly sweet, cheap malt, corn syrup, a little metal. Slick finish. Bad.
DavidAust (183) - Brisbane, AUSTRALIA - APR 29, 2015
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
This is what I drank when I believed the marketing and didn’t know what beer could taste like. That was 20 years ago between the ages of 18 -24. Just the same as most other mass produced Australian Lager. I often wonder if Fosters and Crown are the same product in different packaging so a premium can be charged for Crown.
If you do have one, have it very, very cold and on a hot day where you are thirsty enough for anything to taste good. (i.e. take out of fridge and place in freezer, go mow the lawn for 30 minutes, then drink.) To my mind that is the only way you will appreciate it.