CitrusP (57) - Newcastle, - SEP 8, 2012
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
thin, watery, next to no hop are malt flavours. Not even sessionable which is what it’s designed for. Drink it very cold, or even better, not at all. Standard Australian macro garbage.
22415brewery (360) - redmond, Washington, USA - DEC 5, 2013
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Pours from the bottle a medium golden with a slight amber shadow, minimal white head that dissipates quickly. Aroma is neutral, slightly dusty, and a little grainy, no noticeable hop notes. Tastes very plain, no distinct malt flavors or esters. Hop presence is equally nil. There really is nothing distinguishing about this beer other than a slight metallic taste in the finish. There has got to be a better alternative In Australia where a bottle of beer will run you $4+ at the grocery store.
Morboso (4) - ECUADOR - OCT 17, 2013 does not count
4.2 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 18/20
pretty surprised by the low scores, this is one of the best commercial beers for mass consumption in Australia. Best on tap.
Sledutah (3651) - Utah, USA - AUG 23, 2013
2.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
On tap at The Australian Hotel
Clear golden with a small white head, light lacing. Aroma of pale malts and hay. Flavors of malts, grainy and hay
Not much flavors
gnoff (7036) - Mölndal, SWEDEN - AUG 19, 2013
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Draught as part of a tasting paddle at The Australian Hotel on July 12, 2013.
Clear golden color, white head. Weak malty, sweet taste. Fizzy thin mouthfeel, very low bitterness. Weak, sweet, malty scent.
Rob_D_UK (472) - Surrey, ENGLAND - AUG 8, 2013
1.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Only cost me $2 so who can complain? This beer has a light yellow body - hue with a bitter initial flavor and a light body.
mattyhennessy (109) - Highton, AUSTRALIA - AUG 5, 2013
0.9 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Clear yellow beer with a white head that dissipates quickly. No flavours that stand out. Reminds me of budweiser. Very little to say about this.
goozen (2568) - Leiden, NETHERLANDS - JUN 29, 2013
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Bottle at Duke of Oz, Leiden: Golden clear brew with slightly bitter taste thats have some annoying sweetness.
danlo (693) - Durham, ENGLAND - JUN 27, 2013
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Bottle. Golden amber colour, thin white head leaving some lacing and malty, earthy aroma. Taste is malt, biscuit, abit metallic bitterness. Slightly creamy mouth feel, light bodied, medium carbonation. Another bland lager.
Machalel (32) - AUSTRALIA - MAY 19, 2013
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Appearance: Poured a pale amber with a very weak head that disappeared almost immediately. Lacing down the glass was almost non-existent.
Aroma: Not a lot going on here. Smells like very faint ’beer’, and no more specific than that.
Taste: Some pale malt and a bit of bitterness. A bit of grains in the background, but nothing that stand out.
Mouthfeel: Medium carbonation, low body, again... nothing that stands out.
Drinkability: Sure, you can drink it, but with many other options out there that are infinitely better, why bother?
maus (12) - Tartu, ESTONIA - MAY 17, 2013
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Clean, crisp, quite dry. Refreshing drink on a summer day.
Nose is a bit citrusy, but it might be my hopeful imagination. Taste is bland, boring. Doesn’t stand out in pale lager category.