0.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20 Sully (1378) - Potts Point, New South Wales, - JUN 18, 2003
They have a lovely picture of barley on the label. Nice touch, if only there was some in the can. Why do people bother with light beer?
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20 madquacker (867) - Canberra ACT, AUSTRALIA - JUN 9, 2009
Very very watery and bland. Have it cold but preferably stick to Cascade Light. It dull but not offensive.
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20 nate2g (1548) - Marlborough, NEW ZEALAND - MAR 29, 2008
OK. Not a bad light beer, pale colour, no head. Grainy aroma, very water-like body, quite boring.
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20 bridge (659) - Sydney, AUSTRALIA - OCT 3, 2007
Well, this has got one up ona lot of the CUB products - it actually is drinkable. To some degree anyway, because it tastes remarkably like soda water with a hint of PoR. There actually is a bit of an aroma, although thankfully it disappears on tasting because it’s not great. I still find it amazing that companies can get away with putting things like "full flavoured" on beers like this - bring on the ACCC! zzzzzz...
1.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20 DuffMan (4425) - the land of bitumen, beef & beer, Alberta, CANADA - AUG 13, 2007
Pale straw yellow, weak grainy aroma, same watery weak palate. You’ve reeeaaallly got to be low on choices to turn to this stuff.
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20 highlandlad (1329) - Blue Mountains, AUSTRALIA - NOV 23, 2006
Things that Carlton Light is light on: flavour, smell, body, head, alcohol, barley malt, flair, invention, ambition, passion, character, quality, pleasure. It’s drab-looking lager with a sparse standard-issue CUB head (no point in a brewer worrying about head when the beer will be drunk from a stubby, is there?) The aroma is piercingly uric and grassy. There are unexpected honey notes in the mid-palate before a classic metallic POR finish. To be fair, this has solid bitterness for a low-alcohol beer. Just a pity it’s bitterness of the sucking-pennies variety. Soda-water thin body. By no means the worst in the CUB range. (330ml bottle. Best before Jan 2007)
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20 bluevegie (2926) - Perth, AUSTRALIA - SEP 5, 2005
Almost golden body, short lasting head, lager taste with some bitterness. Still it was boring but inoffensive.
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20 JoeMcPhee (6965) - Toronto, ON, Ontario, CANADA - AUG 2, 2005
Pale golden colour, thick white head. Pale malt aroma, a bit cardboardy and stale. Faint honey sweetness. Very simple and boring.
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20 omhper (15956) - Stockholm, SWEDEN - JUN 10, 2005
UPDATED: JUL 14, 2005 Bottled. Pale golden, airy head. Light raspberry aroma. Sweet and rather thin with some flavours of cardboard and metallic vegetables. Luckily the awful flavours of Melbourne Bitter is here diluted, making this a much more drinkable liquid.
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20 mullet (849) - Melbourne, AUSTRALIA - OCT 15, 2004
Very pale and very clear, no head retention. Yeasty, steamy aroma with onions and sesame seeds. Kinda watery, very much devoid of sweetness which is at least interesting. Dry and savoury, perhaps some salt and slight carbonic bite. Not terrible.
This is the tenth rating - will this put it in the bottom 50?
1.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20 Nemo (100) - Fremantle, AUSTRALIA - JUN 29, 2004
Pale Gold in Colouring with a smallish but thick white short lasting head. A hint of a bitter hop aroma. Bitter, wheaty, chemical-urine flavour with an acidic type of tasting finish.
|