davidm (1928) - Sunnyvale, California, USA - NOV 3, 2011
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Bottle 330ml. Uninteresting. Aroma of hay. Taste is sweet, and short-lived. Palate is thin and watery. Yellow, with a head that doesn’t last.
gam (3219) - brisbane, AUSTRALIA - AUG 12, 2011
2.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Bright yellow pour decent head carbonation medium aromas hops lemon flavour bitter but more sour light grassy taste short flavours mild maltiness sweetness finish weak beer tastes few and mild but goes down okay
Westmeister (1733) - Atlanta, Georgia, USA - AUG 9, 2011
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
UPDATED: OCT 1, 2011 Wow was pleasantly surprised with this one. Actually had a light citrus aroma and some decent flavor to it. Was quite thin, but that is to be expected for such a low alcohol brew. The hops definately poke through to give a crisp and clean and mildly bitter finish. I would say for what this is, this is ok.
ALLOVATE (2384) - Perth, AUSTRALIA - JAN 17, 2011
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
It’s well charged, and effervescent yellow gold, very thinly looking.Typical artificial fluff atop. Feint staling hop flowers on the nose, some damp cardboard and peanut husks. Astringent swallow, very watery, sweet, burnt caramel front is odd, again some peanut husks mid-palate and late strained citrus, but it’s so subtle in flavour it might just be my imagination. Becomes increasingly soapy, lathers the mouth with a film. No aftertaste is a benefit. Sad really, that someone high up is responsible for brewing shite like this!?! (35,5cL, 18/06/11, Thirsty Camel Butler)
madquacker (1036) - Canberra ACT, AUSTRALIA - OCT 9, 2009
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Was expecting this to be awful in typical CUB/ anything ’pure blonde’ style but was pleasantly suprised. Was synthetic and designed to a forumula but some steady citrus notes and a decent taste beneath the watery overtones. Fizzy and refreshing.
DuffMan (6670) - the land of bitumen, beef & beer, Alberta, CANADA - JUL 13, 2009
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 7/20
Bottle. Geez it’s tough rating lagers! This is just bland, thin, and non-descript. Nothing offensive apart from its sheer dullness. A papery, dry, flavourless clone of so many others out there. This scores a few points lower just because I’m frustrated with lagers all around at the moment, having rated a lot more than usual recently.
NoiZe (2324) - Amersfoort, NETHERLANDS - JUN 21, 2009
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Had this one during my holiday in Australia april/may 2009. Golden colored brew. Lime, sour, watery.
bluevegie (3052) - Perth, AUSTRALIA - APR 10, 2009
2.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Light bronze body with no head at all. Muted taste of hops, similar in the aroma, didn’t expect much and that is what I got.
mkel07 (3339) - Brisbane, AUSTRALIA - MAR 21, 2009
2.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Was dubious about another blonde beer from CUB but thought I would give it a crack. Not the best or worst I ever had. Crisp and sparkling clear amber colour with a small white head and strong malt overtones. Thin and watery taste.
nate2g (1548) - Boomtown! / Waikato, NEW ZEALAND - JAN 31, 2009
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Appalling beer that I regret leaving a rating for. Give this one a miss and save your health.