SilkTork (5216) - Rochester, Kent, United Kingdom, Kent, ENGLAND - OCT 2, 2002
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
UPDATED: NOV 19, 2007 Oct, 2002 I somehow feel cheated. Not that I was expecting something great, just something a bit individual, something with a bit of character. Even something really bad would have been better than this bog standard lager. [1.7]
Nov, 2007 Bottle at Azouma Moroccan restaurant, Canterbury. A clean, spritzy lager. Mild fruit with a modest Saaz finish. Drinkable, though fairly ordinary. [2.1]
jazz88 (2551) - San Francisco, California, USA - SEP 27, 2002
2.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Bottle. What jumped into my glass? The aroma is pretty good with some hop and fruit aroma. Can’t say much for the flavor - at least it isn’t painful.
ARMed (598) - Garnet Valley, Pennsylvania, USA - AUG 26, 2002
4.1 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
I really enjoyed this flavorful beer. Maybe it was because I had already walked 10 miles walking thorugh Magic Kingdom and EPCOT, but the beer was extemely refreshing and quite suprising. Highly recommend finding one in the Morrocon section of EPCOT. It won’t disappoint!
austinpowers (2826) - New York, New York, USA - AUG 3, 2002
2.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
UPDATED: JUN 6, 2005 A bit sour, otherwise this is an unremarkable American Standard lager. Unlike ’Casablanca’ the film, this version is eminently forgettable. 6/05 rerate: Renamed Casa Beer - WTF? Still lousy, overly fizzy and much like a Bud.
Nuffield (3668) - Roseville, Minnesota, USA - JUL 17, 2002
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Of all the refrigerators in all the towns in all the world, this beer walked into mine. Watery, unattractive color, slight bitter but otherwise no flavor to speak of. Take a bit of dialogue that sums it up: Ugarte: You despise me, don’t you?
Rick Blaine: If I gave you any thought I probably would.
Ringo (963) - Loveland, Colorado, USA - JUN 30, 2002
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Horrid, awful stuff. I usually give lagers the benefit of the doubt but this sucks. 1.4 is probably generous.
k2 (146) - USA - JUN 28, 2002
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
Had to try. The best thing I can say is I have had a beer from Morocco. Really bad aftertaste.
SJP (483) - Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA - MAY 5, 2002
3.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
Very good lager. I don’t usually like lighter beers, but I had to try a beer from Morocco when I saw it. Very crisp hop flavor that is very refreshing. Just the thing on a hot day.
Aurelius (4121) - Tallahassee, Florida, USA - APR 30, 2002
3.6 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
A bready and hoppy lager. Excellent. I feared a case of intestinal parasites, coming from Morocco, but this was good beer. Good bottle shape -- excellent with beef and cheese.
stella99 (2) - Colorado, USA - APR 24, 2002 does not count
4.2 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 18/20
Couldn’t believe this beer is actually from Casablanca, Morocco!!? Unbelievably tasteful & refreshing. I’d drink it any time of the day/night.