salvador (10), London, England
| 1.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 4/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 6/20 |
Feb 17, 2004 Pretty crap, below the standard of many mediocre Euro macro-brews. Watery, boring, unbalanced. This stuff is on a par with Carling, and yet it is sold as a premium brand in the UK!
 Jeppe (2638), Ølbutikken, Denmark
| 1.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 5/20 |
Feb 15, 2004 Boring ordinary international lager. Sadly I have to drink these to get my countries list up ;-) The only good thing to be said about this lager is the quite hoppy flavor.
madsberg (4958), Søborg, Denmark
| 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 9/20 |
Feb 3, 2004 Bottled: Light yellow coloured. Harmonic quickly diminishing white head. Malts, corn, fruit notes and some hops notes in the aroma. Hops and fruits in the flavour. Nice bitter in the aftertaste.
Tessic (447), Brantford, Ontario, Canada
| 2.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 10/20 |
Jan 29, 2004 This lager pours a clear light yellow colour with a bright white frothy head. Light aroma of corn and citrus with a little malt and some slight yeasty notes. First sip was a little sour to start then ended up bitter till the finish. The medium palate had lingering bitters and really went off to nothing. Very boring beer.
21iceman40 (1731), vienna, West Virginia, USA
| 2.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 9/20 |
Jan 15, 2004 so is this beer really from africa? Anyway it had the golden color of a lager, the aroma of a lager and a taste that was actually a little deeper malted then most american macro lagers, so at least it accomplished that.
DanielBrown (1919), Birmingham (via Leicester), West Midlands, England
| 2.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 |
Dec 31, 2003 Bottle. This is actually OK, for a macro beer, albeit South African. Golden colour, with big carbonation, as per usual, and quite a nice rich, malty flavour for a lager: that is satisfying and refreshing.
Gromit (461), Port Orchard, Washington, USA
| 1.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 4/20 |
Dec 20, 2003 One word comes to mind: Blah.
Not even worth the 79c I paid for the thing.
Poured with virtually no head and what it had was gone within seconds.
The taste is, well, not terrible but not very good. Maybe I've been having too much good beer lately so this one really stands out as being exceptionally mediocre. It also leaves an aftertaste.
Mouthfeel is like a thick American macro.
I'd likely reach for one of these over a Coors or whatever, but only if there were no other choices.
bluevegie (2188), Perth, Australia
| 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 9/20 |
Dec 17, 2003 Initial first taste is not a balanced bitter taste. Hop aroma just above a pale golden colour, drinkable but not that good.
|
Rate This
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)