Rundstedt (3) - Miami, USA - DEC 9, 2004 does not count
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
UPDATED: MAR 20, 2005 Water, that’s it. No tipical flavour nor aroma. Sincerelly you cannot recognize any basic taste on this very humble beer. Drink at 3-5 C° degrees not to be more disappointed. This thing calms your thirst nothing more. All chemical, brewed in gigantic steel cans and sold by the millions. Don’t even think on trying this garbage.
KAggie97 (3529) - Ugly, Hot, and Humid Spring, Texas, USA - NOV 7, 2004
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
Typical of just about everything south of the Rio Grande in that it has some funky aftertaste I can’t quite put my finger on, nor do I have the energy or inclination to do so. I wasn’t expecting much, and my expectations were met.
apost8n8 (123) - USA - SEP 1, 2004
1.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
I guess its the Bud of Chile. Pale, watery, weak, nothing redeeming here. I stuck to the Vino and Pisco Sours... much much better. Pretty surprising consider the German influence in that country.
haddon90 (1429) - Denver, Colorado, USA - JUN 17, 2004
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
A light golden color with a slim white head. Grassy, malty aroma. Nothing special. Kind of skunky taste. Grainy. Bad malt too. Not too impressed with this. Just blah!
hershiser2 (1208) - Charlottesville, Virginia, USA - JUN 17, 2004
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 3/20
Light golden with a tiny head. Lotsa bubbles running up the glass.
Bad stench coming off the beer... I smelled it as soon as I popped the top open. Tastes dirty, stingy, and like a beer that may have sat in the garage all summer, then chilled, then consumed. Yuck.
Eyedrinkale (3213) - Astoria, New York, USA - APR 2, 2004
1.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Without doing a lot of reaserch on other beers from Chile, I bet there are better. Piss yellow color and shitty fucking taste. Down the dria it goes.
MilkmanDan (1943) - Eagan, Minnesota, USA - FEB 26, 2004
1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
Quite pale. Nose hardly exists, a bit grassy and sour. Artificially sweet up front, has a sugar-free sweetener sort of harshness to it. Sweetness is killed off by an unpleasant chemical character, bitterness, and sourness. Mead is what you get when you brew with honey and water. This is what you get when you brew with weed killer, Nutrasweet, and sewage.
smoosh (536) - New Albany, Indiana, USA - NOV 6, 2003
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Bottle: Next to no aroma - maybe a bit of malt? Looks like Bud Light. Fizzy. Very little flavor. Why bother. Glad it was a single and not a sixer.
Wakie (612) - Centreville, Virginia, USA - OCT 6, 2003
1.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Bland and watery. The world is full of beers like this one. Ugly yellow color with lots of foam. This one distinguished itself by gradually getting worse the more of it I drank.
Slick (1969) - Thief River Falls, Minnesota, USA - SEP 10, 2003
2.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Pale color,small white head that faded fast.The aroma was malty sweet with a mild presence of hops with the taste being malty sweet and slightly medicinal with a faint amount of hops.After taste was forgettable.Sweet malt and little else,nothing special here with the exception of having another brew to rate.