Plimmer (252) - Frederiksberg, DENMARK - FEB 12, 2008
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
Bottle 33cl. Golden clear body with normal size head. Generally sweet nose. Malt and hops in flavour. Mild short finish.
oberabcbbsok (687) - Hoboken, BELGIUM - FEB 11, 2008
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Bottle in chinese restaurant. Not so many taste in this lager. It has some bitterness but that is all i can taste
cazort (516) - Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA - FEB 10, 2008
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
(Bottle) Much darker than most pale lagers. Some hops and some bitterness, not very crisp though. Richer and slightly maltier, with a bit of caramel taste. Little complexity, but not bland, and fewer objectionable qualities than most macro-brews. I don’t notice much detriment to the rice, unlike many other macro brews that are brewed with rice. Actually, my main complaint about this is that it’s a bit too heavy. Overall, however, I think the other brewers are probably being a bit prejudiced against macros in their ratings...I think this one could contend with some better beers.
SudsMcDuff (5825) - .....Manchester United.........., Texas, USA - FEB 10, 2008
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Not a bad lager, is smooth and refreshes the palate. Aroma of typical indian lagers with more rice rice maybe?... Taste is simple and plain, but doesn’t hurt the beer. some better, alot worse!
they do sponsor the Toffees you know!?!"
Embrouille (2827) - SWITZERLAND - FEB 10, 2008
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Bottled 33cl. It pours a golden beer with an average white head. Lively carbonation. The nose is sweet, oily with hints of wet cardboard, rosemary, soap and rice. Watery, sweet and rather oily. Hints of biscuit and lime. Surprising alcoholic finish with hints of grass, litchi and butter.
mgoy (344) - New York, New York, USA - FEB 8, 2008
1 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
While not painful to drink, Chang beer is one of those few pale lagers that wish to be compared to an american light.
charlotte (4211) - rødovre, DENMARK - FEB 7, 2008
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Golden colour with white head.Taste of malt and hops a bit grainy but fresh and mild short sweet finish.
Cornfield (5482) - Oak Forest, Illinois, USA - FEB 3, 2008
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
From the brown bottle this poured a pale yellow body with lots of lively bubbling and a modest yet sustained head. The aroma is sugary sweet with a touch of pale malt. No hops. Same with the flavor, hopless and sweet with an oily palate to boot. It’s drinkable, but then, so are a lot of beers that I won’t be having again.
<font size=-4><a href=http://www.ratebeer.com/Places/ShowPlace.asp? Beverage Depot, Orland Park, IL<font size=-1>
presario (4625) - Stampede City, Alberta, CANADA - JAN 21, 2008
2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
A find in a Mexican supermarket. Quickly thinning soft white head on light gold. Light bread with a hint of grass in aroma. Flavour starts sweet, then crackers and grass before a vegetable finish. Can finish it but would not want another. Makes me appreciate the Sol here.
junon (414) - Honolulu, Hawaii, USA - JAN 17, 2008
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
UPDATED: OCT 21, 2008 Hmm. Pours typical of a Pilsner and the like. Clear gold thats actually quite sharp, really. Its not ugly by any means. I think theres quite a bit of carbonation actually. Plenty of bubbles rising to the surface and that carbonation bite on the tongue. Quite nice feeling. Not too much to the aroma unfortunately. The taste is quite common however. No distinction that I can tell. I had a lot to say about this beer but I do not rate it very high. However I was not at all disappointed in it.