Cybercat (3650) - Georgia, USA - FEB 20, 2015
3.2 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Pours clear, dark amber with a thick, if not persistent, buff head. Looks more like an ale than a typical lager. Malty aroma has a strong fruity overtone, apple with some pear. Flavor is more pale ale than lager, malty with some fruity notes and a hint of hops. Nothing special, but enjoyable. Body is fairly firm, if lacking fizz. Overall, not too shabby.
troyc (2776) - Illinois, USA - FEB 9, 2015
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
[Bottle] Bright golden pour with a dense white head on top. Notes of cereal grains and a light grassy bitterness in the nose. Flavors of grassy hops, and lighter herbal note, grains and crackers. More bitterness than expected. Good balance. Overall, pretty decent in my opinion.
miyauchi38 (471) - chicago, Illinois, USA - JAN 16, 2015
2.5 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
jeffbigD (78) - - DEC 12, 2014
2.7 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Not a normal tasting pale lager. Hop taste was week and over weird. Sub par pal lager.
TheHopster (863) - Netcong, New Jersey, USA - MAR 21, 2014
2.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Bottle at the Renaissance, Chicago O’Hare bar. I was hoping for something more impressive with this name from a local brewer but I was disappointed.
wmubronco1992 (649) - Coldwater, Michigan, USA - AUG 17, 2013
2.7 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Bottle. Pours light honey color. Healthy white head that dissipates to a foamy finish. Some lacing. Not picking up much aroma. Taste is a grainy bitter. Dry finish. Not terrible, not great, just ok.
Fredis23 (515) - Hickory Hills, Illinois, USA - AUG 3, 2013
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 11/20
Light Copper, Huge Long Lasting Foamy Head, That Left Lots Of Lacing. Faint Hop Aroma. Grainy, Malty, Good Hop Finish, lasting Light Bitter aftertaste. I also had my portion of beers from Stevens Point, WI that were below par but this one was quite good. Whoever says that this one is like a macro, ever did not have a macro in a while and do not remember what they taste or should write me, so I could try a macro that has actual hops in it. Like I’ve said, pretty good for a style that is somewhat bland and is not that exciting. Refreshing and good thirst Quencher. Worth a Try.
Pailhead (5272) - Brownstown, Michigan, USA - JUL 7, 2013
2.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Bottle: The aroma is pretty nonexistent. There’s just a hint of bread/cereal and grass. It pours a transparent gold with a one finger white head that quickly fades to a thin film. There is some decent thin webbing left on the sides of the glass. The flavor starts with with a very quick dose of light honey and cereal. The finish has light grass with just a hint of apple. It’s light bodied with moderate-lively carbonation that is a bit prickly at times. Overall, there just isn’t much here. Sure, more flavor than your standard BMC, but this is still pretty bland. I guess you can call it a thirst quencher since there just isn’t much here to get offended by. That also means there’s nothing here to look forward to or get excited about either. There’s certainly worse out there.
rumproasts (3498) - Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA - JUN 18, 2013
2.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
bottle. Golden with small head. Lager with hoppy bite. Like all classic Chicago beers, it’s brewed in Wisconsin. Is there anything good they brew at Stevens Point?
b3shine (6101) - Indiana, USA - JUN 15, 2013
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Bottle to pint. Looks solid; a transparent golden orange with foamy white head and lively carbonation. Smells and tastes doughy and a little skunky with an average (at best) mouthfeel. Meh.