GT2 (5659) - Riverslime, California, USA - JUN 10, 2012
1.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
355mL RBSH2 Rate thanks to MrChopin. Team Tubes FTW. Pours clear gold with a suddy macro lager soapy white head. Weak soapy retention. Nose is canned pineapple and sugar cube. Taste follows suit with some mild soap and toffee. Headache inducing chemicals. Metallic finish. Bleh. Why not just drink Bud Light?
davey101 (494) - Connecticut, USA - MAY 4, 2013
3.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Huge thanks to match1112 for this pink wale of mine. What luck he has for having this in his distribution. 12 oz bottle into a tulip glass.
A - Crystal clear yellow. Pale as can be. Faint edging and a swirl yields some quick lacing.
S - Very sweet corn aroma. Its a sweetness that I attribute to most AAL, but it cranks things up to 11 with an almost fruit like level. It smells....attractive?
T - Sweet corn, a bit of cereal grain, and then nothing. Perhaps the least offensive, least interesting, and least imaginative beer I have ever had. Mouth feel is crisp and lively.
O - I mean....its kind of good. Its a very sweet and light beer that I could drink far too easily. Its just so damn easy. Iím gonna go ahead and use a word that youíll probably never see on this page. Quaffable. Bam, chick beer is quaffable.
CanIHave4Beers (2495) - Des Moines, Iowa, USA - APR 15, 2013
1.7 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
Pours golden with a head that fizzes out like root beer.
The aroma is unappealing, corny, alcoholic, with some odd toasty maltiness. Itís an overly sweet smelling beer... not a whole lot drawing me in here.
The flavor is lots of sweet corn, some light fruity notes... defiantly better tasting than smelling... but not by much. Light bitterness, overly sweet... Not without mild pleasantries, but very few of them.
BVery (4251) - Burnsville, Minnesota, USA - MAR 22, 2013
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Bottle. Pretty bad stuff right here. Pale gold pour with a minimal head. Cheap lager, adjuncts, slightly sweet, sharp carbonation. Bleh.
Squizzle (47) - Idaho, USA - FEB 3, 2013
2.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 14/20
UPDATED: MAR 18, 2013 Despite the ridiculously offensive nature of the marketing of this beer which is why I gave it a poor appearance rating this beer is the best ďlightĒ beer I have ever had to date. Based soley against its other light beer competitors I give it said rating. That is all I have to say about that.
thedm (4773) - Fort Wayne, USA - DEC 30, 2012
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
This bottled brew from a bottle shop poured a large sized head of foamy finely sized bright white colored bubbles that were and left behind a softly carbonated transparent weak yellow colored body and a thick foamy lacing. The aroma was awful and grassy. The mouth feel was weakly tingly at the start and at the finish. The horrible flavor contained notes of grassy lagerish and mild maltiness. A horrible one that I would not buy again.
argo0 (10388) - Washington DC, USA - NOV 16, 2012
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
12oz bottle, buried in my fridge for 5 months, trying to but ultimately failing to forget its existence, thanks MrChopin. Small white head atop crystal clear apple juice body. Aroma is medium sweet, berry/melon, some cereal, bread, light acetone. Taste is medium sweet, berry, corn, some melon, cereal, bread. Light body, lightly prickly. Iím surprised as anything, but itís actually tolerable. Thatís a far cry from good, but itís far better than some beers Iíve had.
craftycarl21 (2025) - Washington, Washington DC, USA - OCT 2, 2012
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
12 oz. bottle too late for RBSH2, thanks to MrChopin. Drank out of the bottle and in the shower. Tastes like a sweeter version of Miller Lite. Not entirely offensive, but still bad.
crossovert (4565) - Wisconsin, USA - AUG 30, 2012
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Has more flavor than miller lite, but I wouldnít call it that much better. Just another shitty pale lager.
Frank (2188) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - JUL 29, 2012
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
This is a ridiculous marketing concept so naturally I had to try it. Iím every woman! In any case, this is a maltier-than-normal pale lager. Itís got a hint of bubblegum and a bit of sweetness. Itís rather full bodied for a light lager but not flabby or overbearing. Carbonation adds just a prickle to keep things interesting. Novelty beers are typically not that good and this is no exception but I must say it is way better than I expected.
Skyview (5023) - Papoose Jct, Minnesota, USA - JUL 11, 2012
1.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Picked up a single 12-oz bottle at Cellars Wine & Spirits in Shorewwood, MN. Pours a very clear golden straw colored brew with a fast disolving white head that dissipates nearly clean with a thin white ring. Aroma of light grassy hops, a hint of skonk (bottle must have been on the shelf for a long time), and a hint of sweet corn. Taste is very light bodied, watery with less skonk hop presence, yet some light corn and honey. Finish is quite watery, some light corn aftertaste then some white bread with a drop of honey and light butter. Not my style of craft beer.