vwsteggie (684) - Paxton, Massachusetts, USA - NOV 5, 2002
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
UPDATED: JAN 29, 2003 It is not bad, but I would prefer an apple wine to this. Has a typical cider color and a apple smell(duh). Taste is kind of like the green apples instead of normal cider.
mrkimchee (1414) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - SEP 8, 2002
2.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
quite sweet, but not bad. sweet aroma with juicy apple and alcoholic flavours.
Nuffield (3819) - Roseville, Minnesota, USA - AUG 31, 2002
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
I didnít particularly care for this. Very sweet....
blank (996) - Austin, Texas, USA - JUL 25, 2002
3.3 AROMA 9/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
One of the better cider beers that Iíve had. Decent flavor and it mixes well with real beer. A good finisher for the evening
Wakie (612) - Centreville, Virginia, USA - JUL 20, 2002
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
As ciders go it isnít too bad but if you want something alcoholic and sweet drink a lambic or a mixed drink. Too many of these can make you really sick.
iggysam2000 (38) - Seattle, Washington, USA - JUN 9, 2002
4.1 AROMA 9/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 16/20
Very good flacor it wasnt just a alcaholic cider it was apple beer definitly, it had a beer flavor but instead of bitterness and after taste it had apple flavor pretty good stuff. not my kind of beer but very good.
MaDoG99 (20) - Orlando, Florida, USA - APR 30, 2002
1.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
It tasted too much like apple juice. I didnít like it.
muzzlehatch (4420) - Burlington, Vermont, USA - APR 21, 2002
2.7 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
Appearance: hey, looks like cider! Less bubbly than some. Aroma less sweet and overtly apply, more winelike than I expected; rather nice. Flavor is too sweet, not tart enough, very simple, though the alcohol is more noticeable than in Woodchuckís products. Finishes very dry and quick. A so-so cider; Iíd have it again if in the mood for a beer alternative, but wonít seek it out. Oh, and the label on mine is different than in the pic here; itís very early-Soviet-worker, and pretty cool.
JoeM500 (1907) - Crown Point, Indiana, USA - APR 13, 2002
1.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
way too sweet. I had major heartburn after only one of these. I will side with the folks that like the label (afterall cider rating isnít too exciting!)
grymy (105) - Bel Air, Maryland, USA - APR 3, 2002
3.3 AROMA 9/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 8/20
cant drink more then 6 or ill puke