RateBeer
overall
22
30
style

bottling
unknown

on tap
unknown

distribution
unknown

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 126   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.67   EST. CALORIES: 165   ABV: 5.5%
Share this beer with friends!
No commercial description


2.6
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 10/20
vwsteggie (684) - Paxton, Massachusetts, USA - NOV 5, 2002
UPDATED: JAN 29, 2003 It is not bad, but I would prefer an apple wine to this. Has a typical cider color and a apple smell(duh). Taste is kind of like the green apples instead of normal cider.

2.8
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 11/20
mrkimchee (1414) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - SEP 8, 2002
quite sweet, but not bad. sweet aroma with juicy apple and alcoholic flavours.

2.7
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 9/20
Nuffield (3671) - Roseville, Minnesota, USA - AUG 31, 2002
I didn’t particularly care for this. Very sweet....

3.3
   AROMA 9/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 12/20
blank (996) - Austin, Texas, USA - JUL 25, 2002
One of the better cider beers that I’ve had. Decent flavor and it mixes well with real beer. A good finisher for the evening

2.3
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 10/20
Wakie (612) - Centreville, Virginia, USA - JUL 20, 2002
As ciders go it isn’t too bad but if you want something alcoholic and sweet drink a lambic or a mixed drink. Too many of these can make you really sick.

4.1
   AROMA 9/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 10/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 16/20
iggysam2000 (38) - Seattle, Washington, USA - JUN 9, 2002
Very good flacor it wasnt just a alcaholic cider it was apple beer definitly, it had a beer flavor but instead of bitterness and after taste it had apple flavor pretty good stuff. not my kind of beer but very good.

1.4
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 5/20
MaDoG99 (20) - Orlando, Florida, USA - APR 30, 2002
It tasted too much like apple juice. I didn’t like it.

2.7
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 11/20
muzzlehatch (4424) - Burlington, Vermont, USA - APR 21, 2002
Appearance: hey, looks like cider! Less bubbly than some. Aroma less sweet and overtly apply, more winelike than I expected; rather nice. Flavor is too sweet, not tart enough, very simple, though the alcohol is more noticeable than in Woodchuck’s products. Finishes very dry and quick. A so-so cider; I’d have it again if in the mood for a beer alternative, but won’t seek it out. Oh, and the label on mine is different than in the pic here; it’s very early-Soviet-worker, and pretty cool.

1.3
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 5/20
JoeM500 (1905) - Crown Point, Indiana, USA - APR 13, 2002
way too sweet. I had major heartburn after only one of these. I will side with the folks that like the label (afterall cider rating isn’t too exciting!)

3.3
   AROMA 9/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 5/5   OVERALL 8/20
grymy (105) - Bel Air, Maryland, USA - APR 3, 2002
cant drink more then 6 or ill puke


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  11  12 13


Tick this beer

for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2014,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50