davidpl (435) - Santiago, CHILE - JUL 30, 2007
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Appearance: pale yellow. Little head, without persistency, of white color.
Aroma: like any poor commercial beer. Malty, citric tone and medium hoppyness.
Flavor: same or worse that odor. Malty, citric tone of hops; and finish with medium hoppy and metallic note.
Palate: light body, watery texture. Low carbonation.
Very common and poor lager industrial.
Thanks to <a href=http://www.ratebeer.com/View-User-49371.htm&g and your friends of the ACCCA for to allow me tasted this beer with them.
oh6gdx (19630) - Vasa, FINLAND - JUL 16, 2007
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Canned (in Colombia, under licence). Golden colour with mediumsized white bubbly head, which vanishes quite quickly. Aroma is malts and hops with some hints of maize. Flavour is pretty much the same. Atleast it has some bittering notes in it, but really not that good...
almosi (282) - Viña del Mar, CHILE - JUL 11, 2007
1.7 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20
Somebody had claimed to me that it was a good beer, to be a typical light beer of South America. That somebody was mistaken. Single I can say that it has enough bitterness. The rest is a poor light beer.
jcwattsrugger (10724) - Florida and, New Jersey, USA - JUN 11, 2007
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
12oz bottle-pours a fizzy white head and yellow color. Aroma is lime-citrus light hops. Taste is corn-some sweetness/grain, cereal, lime-citrus light hops. OK /mild carbonation.
tadois (9) - Quito, ECUADOR - FEB 18, 2007 does not count
1.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 4/20
Don´t mind the fact that it smells like a Heineken with a bit of skunks ass, it is the best option for Ecuadorian National Beer (which doesn´t say much).
murswan (2) - CANADA - NOV 20, 2006 does not count
2.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
A European type flavory;a little skunky but decent flavor and oh so good in 35 degree celsius weather!!
Sully (1377) - Potts Point, New South Wales, AUSTRALIA - MAR 23, 2006
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
It is always good to get a rate for free. And thankfully it was. On the Santiago-Auckland leg on Lan Chile I found this on the drinks tray. So, snap it up I say, even though the likelihood of an Ecuadorian beer being any better than the usual Chilean brews on board is slim. Well this certainly isn’t an exclusive cub as it is your typical sudamericanas style of poor lager. Not a good beer.
Nekronos (3359) - Xalapa, MEXICO - JAN 13, 2006
3.9 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
A little honnney alike and very hopy, not my type, but was not bad. The foam was there, and the colour was a little like orange, was a lager eventhough.
maupie (927) - Roosendaal, NETHERLANDS - JUL 16, 2005
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
This beer has a golden body - hue apperance and a coarse white scum collar. I have drunk the beer from the bottle and it had no carbonic acid. The initial flavor taste is bitter.
jeggersdvm (12) - Weilerbach, GERMANY - JUL 1, 2005
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
This is without a doubt the absolute worst beer ever. OK that may be a slight exageration. The taste definitely leaves something to be desired, and the after taste is absolutely horrendous. Sweet at first with a low-grade grain alcohol aftertaste.