 mjg74 (1995), La Mesa, California, USA
Aug 7, 2004 I think that this is a really bland malt liquor. It’s not too difficult to drink, but I still think that this brew sucks.
Darkover (1308), Columbus, Ohio, USA
Aug 2, 2004 Clear yellow with a white head. Sweet aroma. Sweet cakelike flavor. Finish is a little sour. Really not that bad, smooth and drinkable.
drewdogg (62), USA
Jul 31, 2004 Bad even for a malt liquor but great if you get a 40 and want to get a head start on the night.
TC2642 (265), Worcester, Worcestershire, England
Jul 13, 2004 What riles me the most is that I payed good money for this and thus helping to keep the brewery in business. Avoid!
KAggie97 (2406), Ugly, Hot, and Humid Spring, Texas, USA
Jul 5, 2004 I acutally searched for this as a joke, but since it came up I guess I should commment. I would rather drink dog urine, which is probably the main ingredient in this concoction. Anyone who regularly drinks this deserves to lose 40 points on their IQ score. ’Works every time’ my white fanny.
mec3437 (53), Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Jun 28, 2004 Didn’t taste all that bad. Honestly, it was ok. Not big on malt liquor, but I can drink it when I feel a need to. Taste was pale, and aftertaste wasn’t very pleasant. But, paying $1.29 for a double deuce isn’t bad.
ztrvz (218), st paul, Minnesota, USA
Jun 20, 2004 loads better than the ’double malt’. sweet, synthetic, ethanol? nasty aftertaste. 2 bucks? ok, not bad. good buzz. not a good beer. so shoot me.
mohawksin (187), Nebraska, USA
Jun 19, 2004 I’m starting to believe that this is supposed to be skunky on purpose. It always looks so cool and refreshing, but then the taste is just aweful. I have yet to pay for one of these, so I will continue to drink it for free until I get a non skunky one.
|
View Statistics
