tia (848) - Sandston, Virginia, USA - JAN 19, 2013
1.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
RG 19. Very light yellow with almost no head. Smells a little sour and bitter but not much aroma. Watery grain. Sweet finish.
HopTsing (399) - Sandston, Virginia, USA - JAN 19, 2013
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
From the bottle poured a pale yellow brew with a thin white head. Faint aroma of malt. Light bodied with a malty, bread flavor.
EvanFriend (197) - New York, USA - DEC 20, 2012
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
When I was 16 and liked to drink 40s of malt liquor, I still didnít like this.
DruncanVeasey (6642) - NUNEATON, Conference Premier, Warwickshire, ENGLAND - DEC 16, 2012
1.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Clear bottle from Arden Wines, 5.6%. Bright streaming gold with a dense white collar. Sour, riced-up, rubbery aroma with dunked Madeira cake. Sherbet-sprinkled card, licked rubber, boiled white rice flavour. Snotty mouthfeel. Definitely a sharing beer.
DrSilverworm (4106) - Cincinnati, Ohio, USA - DEC 12, 2012
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
Poured myself about a half pint from a 40oz bottle, shared by Nova. Super clear yellow color. Surprisingly decent thin white head, actually leaves lace, too. Kind of a skunky bready light hoppy bready aroma. Surprisingly not that offensive, though. Iím thinking this is because itís only 6% ABV. Isnít the point of a malt liquor to get drunk, officially? I was just drinking a 7.4% ABV saison that actually tasted good before this, so the point here seems less "it gets you drunk" and more "itís cheap". Lightly sweet, light bite to it. Not good, but really, not all that awful. Smooth, lighter carbonation, too. More dry texture, medium to lighter body, even. The only thing exposing this as a malt liquor is that adjunct bite in the finish. I guess thatís what you get, for 6%... Which Iíll say again, is weak. Not really offensive, not at all smooth, and not significantly alcoholic. Just not really much going on here.
bluebetty (1019) - AUSTRALIA - DEC 9, 2012
0.7 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Can with huge thanks to FletchFlighters. Pours a golden straw with rocky white head. Aromas is rubbish. Perhaps some corn. Flavours are the same.
Very poor. Hige thanks to Pat all the same.
BMMillsy (974) - Florida, USA - DEC 5, 2012
0.8 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Wasnt expexting much. Didnt get much. Hooray college...though this was low even for that.
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
radarsock (650) - Massachusetts, USA - NOV 21, 2012
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
Malt extract gains a new thickness in the mouthfeel of this malt liquor; itís still watery but that water has been sprinkled with copper, tangerine extract and spent yeast.
bpar73 (292) - Bellaire, Michigan, USA - NOV 4, 2012
0.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
Back in the day this was one of the under-aged drinkers weapons of choice. Not very good, but effective.
ccex (871) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - SEP 10, 2012
1.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
22 oz bottle purchased from a neighborhood grocery store. Pous a clear golden color with brief fizzy white head. Not much to smell. Aroma is mostly corn. Taste is on the sweet side, but not as offensive as many others of its ilk. Thin, almost watery body. If you want an offensive malt liquor, or a memorable one, this does not do the trick. Thoroughly mediocre, and made me lose all respect for Billy Dee Williams, who sold his soul plugging this in the 1980s.