mgoy (343), Oak Brook, Illinois, USA Mar 2, 2008 All I can say is that it seemed like a good idea at the time. Cheap beer that sis the trick. epf33 (222), Fairfax, Virginia, USA Feb 23, 2008 better than hurricanes. full bodied, but an ugly taste i think, why waste your time with this malt liquor. JasonGoz (10), New Hampshire, USA Feb 13, 2008 great homeboy beer. cheap and does the job. very sweet beer, tastes like crap. DWestrick (234), Ft Wayne, Indiana, USA Feb 8, 2008 like the guy below said, "would never drink for pleasure" - gangster beer that tastes aweful. guyinchicago (516), marengo, Illinois, USA Feb 7, 2008 the brothers in chicago love this shit a long with a fine wine mad dog 20 20 and wild irish rose see emptys all along sidewalks spikester (602), Salem, Oregon, USA Feb 5, 2008 Good drunky brew. Mild taste, no hops apparent, for swilling. Would never drink this for pleasure. Only for party-lube. timfoolery (482), California, USA Feb 3, 2008 This brew is as malty and smooth as Leon Phelps was in The Ladies Man (also a Billy Dee classic). But... Even for the price, you could get a better buzz elsewhere, everytime. DTM (541), Winters, California, USA Feb 3, 2008 Poured a light yellow with quite a bit of carbonation. Sweet malty flavor with little to no aftertaste. Could have been worse.
|