jerseyjohn71 (202) - corsicana, Texas, USA - AUG 17, 2014
3.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
caramel, bread, hay, roasty , nuts, resin, citrus, dough, alcohol, orange, hazy, white foam, lacy, lightly bitter, medium body, creamy, average carbonation, long finish,
Cajun (197) - Lafayette, Louisiana, USA - AUG 11, 2010
4 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 17/20
Tasting - Gulf Brew 2010 - normally I’d have better notes, but the only thing my notes say on this beer is that I’d buy it. I must have enjoyed the look of this pour. I never give anything a 5.
patxa (194) - MEXICO - NOV 26, 2013
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
Tasty lager here. Bubbly and with caramel notes. Ambet looking, light bodied. Short, weak palate, and thats why is just a good try but nothing compare to the Brooklyn Lager.
atlrizzob (178) - Aiken, South Carolina, USA - JUL 28, 2011
3.5 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
This is a pretty good beer with a slight bitter aftertaste that i fell in love with. This beer may give your tastebuds a reverse Onhard.
kwerikson (178) - burlington, New Jersey, USA - DEC 13, 2009
3.6 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
pours out a dark clear honey with a tall off white head that was nicely lumpy. the body is a clear light amber with very few bubbles in the mix. the aromas are a slight malt backbone with nice overtones of a subtle yeast with a light hop presence making an apearance also. it is a sweet yet bitter malty medium bodied flavor that is a little unbalanced. has a nice hoppy taste in the back of the palate when it finishes, but malty with notes of hay, biscuits, butter and sweet nuts. interesting mix of malt and very nice.the aftertaste is light and pleseant that is a little buttery on the tongue. nice beer.
BleacherBum (177) - Blowing Rock, North Carolina, USA - DEC 12, 2008
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Astringent. Buttery. Metallic. And thats just the nose. The appearance was the only thing this beer had going for it. 2 sips and I was done. Buttery, metallic, weird esters and just plain undrinkable. Bad bottle or batch, I assume. A real shame, as these guys typically make some good beer.
posikyle (165) - Alabama, USA - APR 29, 2008
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Eh, not so bad. Pours a red/brown color, aroma is of thick malts, as is flavor, with a floral finish as it sits on your tongue. Thats it. Nothing really special.
natedoggkc (164) - Overland Park, Kansas, USA - SEP 14, 2007
3.5 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Pours hazy amber, nice apperance. Aroma is pretty hoppy and has some caramel in there as well. Definately hoppy with a fairly good balance of sweet malts. The finish is kind of gritty and not to my liking. Not a bad lager though.
phukktifano (159) - Baltimore, Maryland, USA - JUN 10, 2009
3.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 16/20
Amber with a thin white head. Aroma is malt,citrus and hops. Flavor was malt,caramel and a bit of a bitter finish.
forsides (118) - New Jersey, USA - FEB 15, 2009
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
amber, light brown, minimal head. nose is mellow... hoppy, pilsner yeast notes. taste is crisp... well balanced hops and light/medium malts. refreshing, dry finish.. made me realize how long it’s been since i’ve had a lager, and for a lager this is pretty nice.