Pwn3d (1962) - Manhattan, New York, USA - AUG 15, 2007
2.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 10/20
12oz bottle. shared with JRedmond... i didnt enjoy the sour aroma but the texture was nice nice and the flavor was average. Ok beer, prob. will not buy again.
jredmond (6670) - New York, New York, USA - AUG 15, 2007
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
12 oz bottle split with Pwn3d. Body is light yellow. Aroma is skunk and perhaps some hops. Taste is same.
DeadGuyFrank (347) - http://westchesterbeer.com, USA - AUG 13, 2007
3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
UPDATED: AUG 14, 2007 Any lager with “premium” on the label I get very skeptical….Golden Anniversary is a premium lager (not that there is anything wrong with that). I got introduced to Coopers’ products recently and enjoy them, so I was eager to try their “real Australian lager.” It pours a pale golden with a beautiful picture perfect white head; it looks great in a dimple glass. It is a all malt lager that tastes similar to Victory’s Lager (with a little less kick in the back of the throat). Light carbonation, slightly sweet grainy malt notes. A very easy to drink; a decent lager. Buy a six pack or case to surprise some Molson drinkers.
DuffMan (8321) - the land of bitumen, beef & beer, Alberta, CANADA - AUG 7, 2007
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
So I guess Cooper’s has finally bent the knee to the pressures of the mass market. This is average pale lager fare all the way, albeit clean in the ingredients and palate.
littlecarp (135) - Redding, California, USA - AUG 1, 2007
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Mostly malts with a nice bitter finish. Slight chemical taste to it, but overall not too bad.
RichJ7 (1175) - Cullman, Alabama, USA - JUL 25, 2007
2.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Clear pale gold with a thick, fluffy white head. Bready malt aroma. Flavor is pure pale lager, maybe a little more hop character than most US domestics. Slightly sour hop finish. Not bad for a pale lager, but nothing to shout about.
StefanSD (2218) - Lakeside, California, USA - JUL 23, 2007
2.4 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
12 oz bottle at Outback poured into a mug. Was a clear golden color with a quickly diminishing white head. My beer had no aroma to speak of. Flavor was malty-sweet with weak subtle hints of spice and yeast. Mouthfeel was watery with a sustained fizz. There is a thin hoppiness that carries through to the finish. A below average beer.
SSSteve (4007) - - JUL 21, 2007
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
pale gold with a large white head. sweaty, spicy aroma. flavor has notes of toasty malts. light-med bodied. not bad.
wickedpete (634) - Lexington Park, Maryland, USA - JUL 20, 2007
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
I actually liked this. It’s refreshing and easy to drink, with a nice full body all the way to the end. The carbonation is just right making it perfect for a summer day outside.
lb4lb (2580) - Austin, Texas, USA - JUL 14, 2007
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Pours light to medium golden with a decent amount of white head that lasts for a bit. Smell is a mix of slight skunk, along with typical lager yeast, and a bit of malt smells. Taste has a little bitterness up front with a smoother, creamier finish and a small aftertaste. All in all, this is not a bad beer, and is pretty drinkable. If its readily available in your area, it may be worth a try, but it certainly isn’t too unique, I thought.