txspartan (933) - Wilrijk, BELGIUM - AUG 12, 2011
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Malty scent and flavour. Typical lager, nothing else noteworthy about it.
reebtogi (3797) - Edmonton, Alberta, CANADA - JUL 26, 2011
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
pale golden color with small white head and little lacing, decent with malt and floral hops, but a little thin in the body.
wlajwl (3483) - Quad Cities, Iowa, USA - JUL 13, 2011
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
UPDATED: DEC 31, 2011 The aroma is very beery and grainy and the appearance is gold and clear. The flavor is basic pale lager and again very beery. Not really groundbreaking but the graininess gives it an edge that makes it decent although far from unique.
CanIHave4Beers (2880) - Pouring Bus, Iowa, USA - JUN 7, 2011
2.6 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Pale Lager month installment number 10: I suppose in a pinch one might be able to drink this after chopping wood.
Pours golden with a big slightly loose fluffy white head that leaves a nice lace on the glass. The aroma is wet grain and some old vegetables at first, some corn flakes work their way into prominence quickly. The flavor is much nicer, while metallic up front the beer presents the malt nicely while leaving the cornflake character to the aroma. The beer far from sweet and displays a great fruity hop character throughout. Some mineral flavors work well with the more geraniall and herbal hop characters in the finish. Itís a beer I could drink another of.
poisoneddwarf (1602) - Rathdrum, Idaho, USA - APR 29, 2011
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
12.7 oz bottle into lager glass. Pours a clear gold with a small collapsing white head; leaves a blanket and collar of foam. Aroma is faintly spicy, carasmelly, custard (?). Taste is caramel sweet--not too overbearing--and faintly bitter in the finish. Highly carbonated with a medium-thin body and dry mouthfeel. Just okay. Re-rate: I really started getting sick of this by the end of the glass. It started to get cloying. This thing could use some hops.
Stew41 (1662) - Woodend, AUSTRALIA - APR 1, 2011
2.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Mostly a crap beer but the all-malt makes its presence felt. The malt brings a hardness to the flavours that does add some character. Thereís also a grassy farmyard pilsner character as well. Ok, maybe not that crap but not a beer youíd look at again.
jsmerig (1103) - Pennsylvania, USA - MAR 12, 2011
3.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 12/20
Pours a nice yellow gold. Oder of straw. Active carbonation. Nice light pilsner with a clean crisp finish. A bit of a cidery aftertaste.
crossovert (6142) - Illinois, USA - FEB 22, 2011
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Standard stuff. It is a pale lager with a hint of hops and malt. Not the worst but not special.
crajun (873) - , Texas, USA - JAN 14, 2011
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
not a fan, had some at local Aussie beer tasting - canít remember specifics, but didnít like at all - color was fine but taste was watery and off...
cbfobes (2107) - Madison, Wisconsin, USA - DEC 9, 2010
2.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Poured from 12oz bottle, pours a pale golden and is very bland and boring but isnít the worst thing I have ever had.