1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20 mullet (849) - Melbourne, - MAY 29, 2004
Very thick moussy, meringue head which seems to good to be true (ie. artificial). Slightly yeasty aroma but otherwise not much to report. Quite sugar-sweet with some caramel and a kind of sherbet character. Blah.
1.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20 DuffMan (4423) - the land of bitumen, beef & beer, Alberta, CANADA - SEP 10, 2007
This has been retired for a while, but in updating my label collection since my latest trip to Oz I found my notes on this one from 2 years ago. My notes say: "WTF? why would Coopers bother? stinky and overprocessed." In the face of the other fine ales they make, it’s no wonder this one didn’t last.
0.7 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20 duff (5483) - St, Margarets, Greater London, ENGLAND - OCT 19, 2005
Draught@National festival Of Beers, Brisbane, 03’. Not very good at all. Wheres the flavour? Watery, soft, and a little bit fizzy, not much going on.
1.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 9/20 DrunkenCumquat (86) - Canberra, AUSTRALIA - AUG 29, 2005
Bottled as Regency Draught. Straight, simple pale lager that doesn’t offend too much, nor does it inspire. Easily better than Carlton Draught, but that’s saying pretty little.
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20 omhper (15956) - Stockholm, SWEDEN - JUN 10, 2005
UPDATED: JUL 14, 2005 Bottled (labelled Regency Draught). Pale golden, small head. A light flavoured beer with a light-medium body and a hint of bread and crystal malt. A fair amount of grassy hops make for some late bitternss. Easy drinking beer with no flaws.
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20 highlandlad (1325) - Blue Mountains, AUSTRALIA - MAY 24, 2005
Rebranded as Coopers Regency Draught. Poured a hazy gold with a quick-diminishing 1cm head. Un-Cooperslike aroma. The skunkiest beer they’ve produced to date - well done, lads. Faint hints of the house fruitiness but this bottle has a peculiar musty vegetal odour that doesn’t appeal. Plenty of sweet malt upfront on the tongue with a decent shot of Pride of Ringwood bitterness. Tastes better than it smells. Especially if you enjoy a bowl of cornflakes. It’s not unspeakably bad but it’s a mystery why they bother with this sort of stuff.
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20 mutant (854) - Melbourne, AUSTRALIA - JAN 17, 2005
Amber with small but persistent head. Stale hoppy aroma and an almost immediate, long-lasting bitterness. However the actual taste is not very pleasant.
1.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20 SimonLarsen (210) - Sydney, AUSTRALIA - DEC 20, 2004
Lovely big white head which gradually gavfe way to thick lacing. Clear golden and flat body. Wet musty aroma. Heavily sweet flavour in that corn syrup homebrew kind of way. Nothing else woth noting.
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20 Nemo (100) - Fremantle, AUSTRALIA - JUN 25, 2004
Golden colouring with decent sized cloudy off-white head. Stale bitter aroma. Watery dry body, with a harsh bitter finish and aftertaste.
2.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20 theread (51) - Wagga Wagga, AUSTRALIA - MAR 12, 2004
Something Coopers should leave well alone, but having said that, it is way better than the other local West End and better than VB.
Sweet and a funny taste to begin with with a bit of bitterness and odd taste after. OK. Cheers all
|