RateBeer
overall
81
91
style
Brewed by Coopers Brewery
Style: English Strong Ale
Regency Park, South Australia, Australia

bottled
available

on tap
available

Broad Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 744   WEIGHTED AVG: 3.4/5   SEASONAL: Winter   EST. CALORIES: 225   ABV: 7.5%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Bottle conditioned.
Brewed with choice malts and an extended top fermentation. This naturally conditioned ale experiences interactions between the robust malt, hop and yeast characteristics, to exhibit an intriguing journey of flavour development over a period of five years when stored under cellar conditions.


3.3
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 13/20
Dorwart (2491) - Robbinsville, New Jersey, USA - NOV 8, 2004
(Batch # 4-Oct-2002) Large offwhite head. Nice and creamy on top. Settles slowly with great carbonation. Poured this one incorrectly. Tons of big whispy floaters in there. Slightly fruity aroma with a decent amount of malt. Not very complex. Color is a slightly cloudy dark amber. Flavor has a slight peach note to it with a noticiable alcohol presence. Finish is dry and pretty clean. A decnent ale but lacks complexity and some body. Nothing special.

3.4
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 14/20
argo0 (12818) - Washington DC, USA - OCT 30, 2004
(Batch No.4, Oct. 2002) Hazy peach-amber body with dead yeast everywhere, medium beige head. Aroma is moderately sweet, fruity (melon, berry), light peat. Taste is medium sweet, fruity (peach, melon), finishing with some peat and alcohol. Creamy medium-full body.

2.3
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 9/20
Saarlander (1686) - Saarlouis, GERMANY - OCT 28, 2004
I was really dissappointed in this brew, I really thought the flavor would be better. I had a 2002 bottle last week, It tasted like alot of beers I’ve had, and paid much less for. I will try it again sometime.

2.8
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 12/20
sloth (2756) - Ceciltucky, Co., Maryland, USA - OCT 23, 2004
10/02 vintage : Thanks to kawa for a shot at this one : Small tan head, short lived with little lace to speak of. Murky amber color. Very faint malt, fruty nose. Medium/thin body. Lightly malty, bready. Faint hoppiness with some yeasty notes. Fairly dry finish. Not alot going on here, fairly dissappointing. Extra Strong tilte needs to be removed from this label. I,m surprised this has held up this long. A surprisingly very over rated brew.

3.5
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 14/20
Walt (2449) - Austin, Texas, USA - OCT 21, 2004
2002: Poured cloudy amber with thin tan head...smelled malty sweet, melons, apricots, a little vanilla...taste is very sweet and lightly citric...caramel, melon, apricots...nice mouthfeel...clean sweet finish...good beer, I’ll age maybe 2 more bottles...

3.5
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 15/20
MAP (1133) - Lakewood, Ohio, USA - OCT 13, 2004
4-OCT/2002 bottle. Brown amber haze with some lighter flecks floating around in it. Not much head on it either. The aroma is a sweet grassy smell; bananna, coriander and melon. Mouthfeel is somewhat thin and has a smokey bite towards the end. The flavor is a decently hopped to give it a similar sweetness as in the nose. However this isnt something amazing for being a year old, but respectable.

3.6
   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 15/20
Pigfoot (2268) - Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA - OCT 3, 2004
Color is a dark orange, with "floaties" running amok. It can’t be an old bottle, for it’s labeled as being bottled in October of ’02, and promises to improve into 18 months. Perhaps I should have waited that long to see. Head is fine, and white. Aroma is fresh and fruity, peach, apricot, melon, etc., and just a little bit floral. Hops are very light, and malt is just sufficient. Taste is fully fruity and smooth. Sweet, tasty, rich, warm, with a lasting finish. However, for something touted as EXTRA, and SPECIAL, and STRONG, I was disappointed. Perhaps, as they pledge, this "vintage" will improve with time. It was just "okay" for now, though. originally sampled 2-22-03

4.6
   AROMA 9/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 10/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 19/20
mikem (2) - AUSTRALIA - SEP 27, 2004 does not count
The just released 2004 vintage is full of malt character, lovely full mouthfeel. Easy to drink despite the 7.5% alcohol. Flavoursome tripple hopping of Cascade, Pride of Ringwood and Hersbruker. Very smoothand drikable

3.6
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 15/20
MilkmanDan (1943) - Eagan, Minnesota, USA - SEP 26, 2004
Hazy orange-amber. Nose is a bit citric and fruity, a bit yeasty. Malty and a bit bready, some hops, decent sweetness.

3.4
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 13/20
3fourths (8962) - Boulder, Colorado, USA - SEP 19, 2004
Bath 4, Oct 2002 - Very murky dark peach color, like blended fruit juice with heavy pulp... very cloudy and thick looking. Citrus spicy yeast nose, some woody grapefruit and pineapple. Flavor has some light stinging alcohol mixed with a peppy yeast strain, some light Belgian-style spices and a medium palate. Sweet, though lacking depth.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 58 59 60  61  62 63 64 » 75


Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2016,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50