RateBeer
overall
n/a
0
style

bottling
unknown

on tap
unknown

distribution
unknown

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 200   WEIGHTED AVG: 1.11   EST. CALORIES: 124   ABV: 4.13%
Share this beer with friends!
No commercial description


0.9
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 3/20
Slick (1969) - Thief River Falls, Minnesota, USA - MAY 16, 2004
This is some tasty stuff "Psych" I’m glad i managed to get a single of this instead of having to fork over the bucks for a sixer.Nice golden color,small white head that faded quickly.Thin aroma all around with a mild hint of malt maybe some fruit but hard to say...just coming off as bad right up front.Kind of like carbonated water up front with a light fruit presence that fades super fast and goes back to watery,leaving you with that,what the hell was that feeling.This is just poor all around and no doubt it will probably be a hit for low carbers it won’t with the majority of RBer’s.It’s worth trying once i guess but little else beyond that.

1.2
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 6/20
fordest (1961) - Santee/San Diego, California, USA - JUL 30, 2005
Took a spot over Michalob Ultra, and from what I heard about Select, it’s better than that too. So far, if Low-Carb is my limit, this is my choice.

2
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 7/20
frankenkitty (1959) - Oak Lawn, Illinois, USA - DEC 9, 2005
Crystal-clear golden with a soda pop head that just fizzes away. There’s not much going on in the aroma and flavor, but what ISN’T there (in its defense) are adversities: no DMS, no diacetyl, no metallics, not even corn. Flavor is simply very light malts and the performance is fast and crisp. This beer is not at all satisfying, but it’s really not that bad.

<font size=-4><a href=http://www.ratebeer.com/Places/ShowPlace.asp? Liquors, Bridgeview, IL 60455<font size=-1>

0.5
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
MilkmanDan (1943) - Eagan, Minnesota, USA - MAR 6, 2004
What an honor. I get to be the one to add this to the site, and the first to rate it. It's as pale, thin, and watery as could be. I got to sample this side-by-side with Michelob Ultra, and I would have said that was the least flavorless beer in the world, except this one is actually more flavorless. No taste. Literally none. Ultra had very little flavor, but there's nothing going on here. The true irony is that the bimbo serving the samples in the store told me that Aspen Edge was brewed because some people didn't want a beer as light as Ultra, so they wanted to brew a "heavier" beer. This is apparently the heavier of the two. My ass it is. Dear Coors: Fuck you, and fuck your shitty beer.

1.1
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 1/20
Erzengel (1940) - Wuppertal, GERMANY - JAN 28, 2014
12 fl.oz. bottle - 355ml Rating from somewhere before 2008:
Very watery, only slightly grainy, very slightly bitter. Nearly no aroma worth rating. Highly drinkable.

1
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 2/20
SuperDave (1932) - Beautiful Sunny Mesa, Arizona, USA - JUL 2, 2008
Twelve ounce bottle from a friend. Very little color, aroma or flavor. Thin, overly carbonated palate. Carbonated mineral water. It does have alcohol though, so I guess it has something going for it!

0.8
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
stegosaurus (1882) - Levittown, Pennsylvania, USA - JUN 25, 2005
a pale golden pouring beer, with not much smell, not much on taste also, too much of a watery palate, i expected that though from coors, not an enjoyable beer, id never buy it again, i guess it is drinkable, bvut this beer has no life.

0.5
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
crazyvin (1861) - New York, USA - MAR 27, 2004
I actually found a beer worse than rolling rock. I thought beer had flavor. Usually beer has flavor. Aspen has none. Hello, where are the hops? did they forget to put it in? There was some malts in it, but a very light presence. I drank it from the bottle, being to afraid to see the color. Its not easy going up to a girl in a bar and ask her to dance with a glass of urine in your hand. IMO this beer doesn't even erserve the .5 it is going to get.

1.3
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 5/20
Sham (1845) - Seattle, Washington, USA - JUN 6, 2004
Light gold or yellow with small lacing. Very light aromas of hops and malt. Almost non existant. Watery flavors with a touch of malt and hops added. Thin and plain.

1.3
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 5/20
JFGrind (1811) - Glenside, Pennsylvania, USA - MAY 12, 2004
I tried this simply to obtain another rating. First off I was surprised how good this actually looked when poured into a shaker glass. Golden body and medium head. Nothing in the sense of flavor or aroma. Better than a Michelob Ultra if that helps anyone decide which one to try.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page   1 « 4 5 6  7  8 9 10 » 20


Tick this beer

for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2014,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50