RateBeer
overall
n/a
0
style

bottling
unknown

on tap
unknown

distribution
unknown

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 200   WEIGHTED AVG: 1.11   EST. CALORIES: 124   ABV: 4.13%
Share this beer with friends!
No commercial description


2
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 10/20
BigNasty (55) - South Lyon, Michigan, USA - AUG 15, 2005
Non-descript "beer" appearance. Starts with an interesting malty flavor in the first few swigs, but becomes relatively flavorless by the time you finish the bottle. One of the better light lager offerings on the market, but not by much.

2
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 8/20
CaptKirk (175) - Hephzibah, Georgia, USA - OCT 22, 2005
A friend told me to try this when I was going to diet. Water anyone? Totally lacking in taste and character. I just as soon have a regular mich and count the points then have this again.

2
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 7/20
frankenkitty (1959) - Oak Lawn, Illinois, USA - DEC 9, 2005
Crystal-clear golden with a soda pop head that just fizzes away. There’s not much going on in the aroma and flavor, but what ISN’T there (in its defense) are adversities: no DMS, no diacetyl, no metallics, not even corn. Flavor is simply very light malts and the performance is fast and crisp. This beer is not at all satisfying, but it’s really not that bad.

<font size=-4><a href=http://www.ratebeer.com/Places/ShowPlace.asp? Liquors, Bridgeview, IL 60455<font size=-1>

2
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 9/20
bendz1 (87) - Ankeny, Iowa, USA - JAN 7, 2007
Not terrible, but not great either. Not a lot of flavor. Tastes like your traditional american mass market beers. Liked it better than Bud Select.

2
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 10/20
Fabriceprince (10) - New York, USA - NOV 21, 2010
Taste better than some light beers that I have had, but still nothing to rave about in my opinion. It poured a small white head with fine-small sized bubbles that mostly diminished. This beer was carbonated and semi-transparent with a pale yellow hue. The aroma was malty and the flavor was a little hoppy. This was a light bodied beer with some lacing.

1.9
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 8/20
Falconseye8 (542) - Evans, Colorado, USA - APR 25, 2004
I've had Michelob Ultra, now here's what I think of this. Believe it or not its not as watery as Mic Ultra. Nothing really to it. It won't make me fat. It won't give me to urge to pound these either. Tastes better than Mic Ultra. I have to give them that.

1.9
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 7/20
Skrip99 (82) - Los Angeles, California, USA - MAR 3, 2005
The best of the low-carb & calorie brews out there. Has more of a real beer taste then ultra, and certainly much better than the new Buweiser Select. If you are watching your calories or just a healthnut, this is the best of the 3. Not for the more serious domestic brew drinkers, and certainly not for the serious ale/dark lovers, no question!

1.8
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 8/20
JoeyT (8) - New York, USA - APR 19, 2004 does not count
Look, it's a light beer. But it's not bad compared to other light beers. Michelob Ultra was disgusting. This is a drinkable beer for those who need to count calories or carbs. No aftertaste or unpleasant taste. Not a lot of flavor, but hey, it's a light beer.

1.8
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 7/20
BeerLimey (2154) - California, USA - JUL 10, 2004
Tasted on the Coors brewery tour - they say it doesn’t get any fresher or served any colder than this (Wow). Hazy pale golden appearance, no odor. Grainy light flavor, but surprisingly a touch of flavor. Nothing exciting but better than its competitors.

1.7
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 5/20
bu11zeye (11955) - Frisco (Dallas), Texas, USA - MAR 27, 2004
UPDATED: MAY 20, 2004 (Bottle) One of the new low-carb fad beers. If I rate this beer as a water it would rate much higher, as it tastes like it is 95% water. Since water does not have any carbs, hence they colored the water and called it beer.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 2  3  4 5 6 » 20


Tick this beer

for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2014,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50