BigNasty (55) - South Lyon, Michigan, USA - AUG 15, 2005
2 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Non-descript "beer" appearance. Starts with an interesting malty flavor in the first few swigs, but becomes relatively flavorless by the time you finish the bottle. One of the better light lager offerings on the market, but not by much.
CaptKirk (175) - Hephzibah, Georgia, USA - OCT 22, 2005
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
A friend told me to try this when I was going to diet. Water anyone? Totally lacking in taste and character. I just as soon have a regular mich and count the points then have this again.
frankenkitty (1959) - Oak Lawn, Illinois, USA - DEC 9, 2005
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Crystal-clear golden with a soda pop head that just fizzes away. There’s not much going on in the aroma and flavor, but what ISN’T there (in its defense) are adversities: no DMS, no diacetyl, no metallics, not even corn. Flavor is simply very light malts and the performance is fast and crisp. This beer is not at all satisfying, but it’s really not that bad.
<font size=-4><a href=http://www.ratebeer.com/Places/ShowPlace.asp? Liquors, Bridgeview, IL 60455<font size=-1>
bendz1 (87) - Ankeny, Iowa, USA - JAN 7, 2007
2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Not terrible, but not great either. Not a lot of flavor. Tastes like your traditional american mass market beers. Liked it better than Bud Select.
Fabriceprince (10) - New York, USA - NOV 21, 2010
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Taste better than some light beers that I have had, but still nothing to rave about in my opinion. It poured a small white head with fine-small sized bubbles that mostly diminished. This beer was carbonated and semi-transparent with a pale yellow hue. The aroma was malty and the flavor was a little hoppy. This was a light bodied beer with some lacing.
Falconseye8 (542) - Evans, Colorado, USA - APR 25, 2004
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
I've had Michelob Ultra, now here's what I think of this. Believe it or not its not as watery as Mic Ultra. Nothing really to it. It won't make me fat. It won't give me to urge to pound these either. Tastes better than Mic Ultra. I have to give them that.
Skrip99 (82) - Los Angeles, California, USA - MAR 3, 2005
1.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
The best of the low-carb & calorie brews out there. Has more of a real beer taste then ultra, and certainly much better than the new Buweiser Select. If you are watching your calories or just a healthnut, this is the best of the 3. Not for the more serious domestic brew drinkers, and certainly not for the serious ale/dark lovers, no question!
JoeyT (8) - New York, USA - APR 19, 2004 does not count
1.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Look, it's a light beer. But it's not bad compared to other light beers. Michelob Ultra was disgusting. This is a drinkable beer for those who need to count calories or carbs. No aftertaste or unpleasant taste. Not a lot of flavor, but hey, it's a light beer.
BeerLimey (2154) - California, USA - JUL 10, 2004
1.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Tasted on the Coors brewery tour - they say it doesn’t get any fresher or served any colder than this (Wow). Hazy pale golden appearance, no odor. Grainy light flavor, but surprisingly a touch of flavor. Nothing exciting but better than its competitors.
harlequinn (2744) - Tacoma, Washington, USA - APR 29, 2004
1.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Well, about the only thing this one has going for it is it tastes better than Ultra and Green Light, but do not believe the hype, this beer still sucks. Pours slightly darker than its other low - carb candidates, lots of corn and rice adjuncts here, with a watery toasted malt taste every once in awhile. Bottom line, pass this one up.