jcwattsrugger (11004) - Florida and, New Jersey, USA - FEB 13, 2012
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
12oz can-pours yellow with a foamy offwhite head. Aroma is grain, some spice. Taste is sweet grain, some spice hops.
faroeviking (10294) - FAROE ISLANDS - JAN 1, 2007
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Can. Golden colour, average head. Bit sweet aroma of malt. Flavour of sweet malts and corn. Touch of hops in the finish. Not much taste really, quite neutral.
Tmoney99 (10080) - Cincinnati, Ohio, USA - DEC 15, 2006
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Can from Jungle Jim’s. Clear pale hue with an average fizzy white head that diminished slowly with fair lacing. Average hoppy aroma. Light to medium body with a thin texture. Light bitter sweet flavor with an light sweet finish of short duration.
Bov (9050) - Bienne, SWITZERLAND - SEP 3, 2001
2.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
I still cannot understand how I did to rate it so high ...
daknole (8540) - Scottsdale, Arizona, USA - MAR 23, 2008
1.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
I have had this a few times and extra bad should be its name. Ok it is better than Bud or Miller...for sure. But it still isn’t good.
NielsenRatings (8273) - Fort Collins, Colorado, USA - JAN 5, 2014
2.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Fucken can @ home, picked up at some podunk liquor store in Fort Collins. Been wanting to get this tick for a while and I finally pulled the trigger when I found a sixer for $4.19. Typical clear golden appearance with a huge fizzy white head. Aroma is actually pretty grainy, a touch of toast, light bubblegum, and lemon. Fairly full body. Cracker, honey, toasted grainy, somewhat sweet, light candy flavor. Even though it was really fizzy to begin with, the carbonation seems a bit dull. A little fuller than most macro pale lagers but the flavor isn’t anything too enjoyable.
DocLock (7502) - Lower Pottsgrove, Pennsylvania, USA - APR 5, 2004
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
This one tastes way unbalanced to me, but it does have some flavor. Near the top tier of the commercial, shitty, watery American beers.
Dogbrick (7243) - Columbus, Ohio, USA - NOV 14, 2002
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Can version. I paid exactly 50 cents to try this. I was all ready to make fun of the name but this beer really does have an nice gold color which surprised me. It smelled and tasted pretty crappy though, and that didn’t surprise me at all.
shrubber85 (6978) - Greenville, Indiana, USA - JUN 3, 2004
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
UPDATED: SEP 8, 2006 Used to call this Coors Extra Hangover. Price helps the flavor - good for a camping trip or a day at the racetrack - otherwise unremarkable. Slightly more flavor than regular Coors
Ernest (6031) - Boulder, Colorado, USA - JUN 12, 2003
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Head is initially small, fizzy, white, fully diminishing. Body is clear
dark yellow. Aroma is lightly malty (grain). Flavor is moderately sweet,
lightly bitter. Finish is lightly sweet, moderately bitter, husky,
slightly unclean. Light to medium body, watery texture, fizzy
carbonation. Exceptionally grainy/husky, but still better than being
flavorless I suppose.