blutt59 (2091), Dallas, Texas, USA
| 1.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 6/20 | Jul 19, 2008 can, pours light golden yellow with a grassy nose, flavors are bubblegum and algae, tinny finish elihapa (1044), Honolulu, California, USA
| 0.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 1/10 | 2/5 | 2/20 | Jul 17, 2008 This beer is inexcusable. Even its presentation is bad: dull gray-gold cans, who does that?? All this beer is is calories and a skunky metal flavor that is repulsive. Spare yourself and stay away, this beer is a drain pour even at a sloshy Frat party. Jblauvs (542), Manchester, New Hampshire, USA
| 0.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/20 | Jul 14, 2008 the Tan Can. Classic beer, with a classic cheap macro taste of metal and pee. coors light with more calories. VacaBeerDude (19), Vacaville, California, USA
| 0.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/20 | Jul 13, 2008 Just about as average and Ho-Humm as you can possibly get. If you have been working hard and you’re dripping in sweat, and this beer is ICE cold, it works well as a quick thirst quencher. I say quick because the last thing you want is to try and drink this beer after it begins to warm. NOT a beautiful thing. johntreeter (122), Greenwood, Indiana, USA
| 1.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 5/20 | Jul 12, 2008 Well if I was going to drink a macro lager this would be it. Typical American macro. If there is nothing there to be offensive, then there’s no way it can be. JonR888710 (999), Cochabamba, Bolivia
| 1.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 4/20 | Jul 3, 2008 Very golden, like the can, with a white head like the snow of the rockies. Taste is grains and corn with slight acidicness. Wet, long ending with more malts than the others. Doesn’t have a crisp, abrupt ending. This one lingers
Slipstream (746), USA
| 1.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 6/20 | Jul 2, 2008 Another classic approaches the rating table. 24 ounce cream-colored cold-activated can with a frost brew liner. Maybe this beer corporation should spend a little more on their beers and a little less on their cans. Pours out like a typical pale lager with a fast-fading head - only the color approaches a light green. Irritating, fairly skanky scent - stale yeast predominates. The taste is not the worst - some corny sweetness, mixed with malts and a hint of bitter hops. Light-bodied with a fairly mild flavor overall. Adding lime juice does improve it a little. This is mediocre, but drinkable stuff. Still, I remember back to the 1970s and early 1980s when this beer was delicious, and rare in the eastern USA. The unique, nutty flavor that once characterized a frosty Coors is just a memory now. What went wrong? Guinnessman (88), VACAVILLE, California, USA
| 0.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 1/20 | Jul 2, 2008 I can sum up this foul concoction in one word and one word only. BLEAHHH! Need I say more?
|