2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20 iabeerguy (341) - Iowa, USA - OCT 4, 2009
I enjoyed this beer more than most mass produced beers. Not bad but not great. Cheap and easy to drink, not much flavor. Golden yellow color with a medium head. That’s about it.
1 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20 Fratto (1814) - Arlington, Texas, USA - SEP 13, 2009
It’s yellow, bland Coors. What more do I say about it? There’s a mountain that’s color tells me whether the beer is cold or not.
1.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20 MadMan (497) - Tempe, Arizona, USA - SEP 12, 2009
Bottle. Had both original and light at a party. Very light golden color with a white bubbly head. My mountains were blue. Next to no aroma, maybe some light graininess like the light but this one has some sweetness as well. Some hints of malt and a little light sweetness. More flavor than the light, but not really in a good way. I drank it very quickly though and did not spend too much time pondering the finer aspects of it. I think being unable to get this in MN in my youth brought about a mystique that increased it’s popularity in my area. It’s much the same as people speak about Yuengling here in AZ. I wish I could allow those memories to affect my rating, but this is just not my favorite among the macro swill.
1 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20 fsbw21086 (225) - New Jersey, USA - SEP 11, 2009
It taste like the rockies are smoothly flowing down my throat. Untill I realize I am drinking coors.,.. aka Coors "normal" this tastes like coors light bile with a little more crappy flavor. This is a pretty bad beer... but not as bad as budweiser. The only time I would choose this is if there was a decision between this and budweiser. It’s still beer at the end of the day and will get the job done but don’t expect anything more... please... eek
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20 kassner (1002) - Wexford, Pennsylvania, USA - SEP 6, 2009
Not bad but so generic as to be hard to place. I think it is a good light lager but no distinguishing characteristics at all. Just not bad as a low standard.
1.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20 poisoneddwarf (881) - Rathdrum, Idaho, USA - AUG 30, 2009
16 oz can. More flavor than your average macro, but there was definitely not much skill in producing this obviously. Flavors of straw and corn are most prominent.
1.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20 Macadem (103) - Lethbridge, Alberta, CANADA - AUG 27, 2009
Meh. its beer. You have to appreciate coors attention to detail though, as this beer is not brewed in canada because apparently canadian barley doesn’t meet coors quality standards.
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20 drowland (3568) - Tallahassee, Florida, USA - AUG 24, 2009
Had at a banquet (just kidding)... not so great... corny, typical, and yellow. If you must go Coors, sadly, I say go Coors Light.
|