 keepersj12 (786), Sicklerville, New Jersey, USA
| 1.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 4/20 |
May 11, 2007 What happened to this beer. When I was a kid this was so hard to get in NJ that it had a cult following. The cans had two push tabs. A little one and a big one that your thumb would get stuck in. I remember the beer as being something special. I had one after about 25 years and I guess my memory was lying. This stuff stinks.
Bcoble003 (100), Dalton, Ohio, USA
| 1.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 |
May 9, 2007 hmmmm not very impressed with this beer it smells a little sweet but the taste isnt there oh well i guess the best thing about this is one beer closer to 100.
Magjayran (1379), Durham, North Carolina, USA
| 1.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 7/20 |
May 7, 2007 So I was travelling with my band back from a studio in Columbia SC when we realized that a) there was no beer at the practice space and b) it would be after 2 am when we got there. Alcohol sales stop at 2 in the great state of NC. So we stop at a 24 hour gas station in High Point and proceed to pick out beers to enjoy when we arrive home. The selection was not the best and as I agonized over which putrid beer I was going to purchase it became clear that I should pick one that I haven’t rated. So Coors Original it is. It sucked.
scanman (146), Santa Cruz, California, USA
| 1.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 |
May 5, 2007 Of the big three, I think this is the crispest most refreshing pale lager. No icky sweet malts or rice-like graininess. For the price $2.99/sixer, it is well worth the price. 105% value.
bhensonb (4237), Woodland, California, USA
| 1.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 4/5 | 3/10 | 3/5 | 5/20 |
May 2, 2007 Clean, light grainy aroma. Light gold color with a white head that left rather soon. Medium mouthfeel. Starts with very light malt, finishes clean and decently dry, but its not got a lot of hop. Hard to believe the original Coors was so bland and lacking in flavor components.
CaptainBadass (24), Shelby, Ohio, USA
| 3.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 5/5 | 8/10 | 4/5 | 15/20 |
Apr 27, 2007 decent body and crisp taste. doesnt go down as well as it could, but overall it is a really good clean beer. enjoy!
BREWMUSKCLES (1067), New Jersey, USA
| 2.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 |
Apr 21, 2007 coors has got the mark on clean. it has a moderate body and is slightly fillling. the beer is a grain beer, made of cheap ingredients done 1st class. 30 years ago northeasterners drove to alabama to get it. it might not mean anything to you, but to beer drinkers it does.
dpjuart (670), Indiana, Pennsylvania, USA
| 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 9/20 |
Apr 19, 2007 I am not a Coors fan at all, but I have to give it to them. Coors Original is actually decent directly out of the tap at the Brewery in Golden. But that’s all I can give to them.
|
Rate This
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)