georgekillian (184), USA Mar 28, 2005 another disgusting mass produced beer by coors. i think this is the only orginal lager that is outdone by it’s light beer counterpart. terrible stuff can8ianben (903), Pasadena, California, USA Mar 23, 2005 Not very good but the people who like this beer seem to love it. I’m surprised it is still around, is it just so that Coors Light has a Coors product that shows what the light beer is dropping down from? Tends to get skunky because people don’t move it off the shelf as fast as Coors Light. Stay away. cAPSLOCK (154), Dallas, Texas, USA Mar 22, 2005 What on earth is a ’Banquet brew"? What could possibly cause people to drive to buy this ’back in the day’ when they could buy Budweiser, Miller etc in their own state. Perhaps moderately more distinctive than the other Macros by its over-sweetness and what is either mild hops or aluminum can taste. There is no reason to drink Coors in my opinion. It is not cheap enough. robpet (98), Stone Mountain, Georgia, USA Mar 18, 2005 Like the rest of the macro lagers. Only good if ice cold in the summer. Corn flavor, pea color, fizzy head. No odor or finish. donrajin (233), Roanoke Rapids, North Carolina, USA Mar 15, 2005 Not a very good beer. Better than Miller High Life, but even worse than Budweiser. darkko (99), Kingsport, Tennessee, USA Mar 14, 2005 This is probably the best of the American macros. Has the least bite of any. Almost no taste at all. But at least it doesn’t taste like corn or have that skunky odor. Gurst (338), Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA Mar 14, 2005 For an American megalager, this is pretty decent. Better than Bud, below Miller. C for effort. mephisto (1144), Taiwan Mar 6, 2005 another mass produced lager. thank you very much, but this is definitely not the best american beer.
|