 ultraspank (866), Dublin, Ohio, USA
| 1.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 6/20 |
Oct 15, 2002 Not alot going on here. Nose is honeyish with some perfume. Pours light sparkling straw yellow. Average white head is fluffy with almost no lacing, and lasts maybe a minute. Flavor is virtually non-existant, practically mineral water. Palate is light watery, and fizzy. This flat out sucks.
msante79 (858), Orland Hills, Illinois, USA
| 1.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 |
Jun 18, 2009 Had at Coors Stadium of all places. Pours golden with white head. Aroma is corn and malt. Flavor is light with grain and some malt. Tastes no different than any other macro lager. Ok at a ball game.
mansquito (851), Boston/Philadelphia, USA
| 1.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 1/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 5/20 |
Jan 1, 2010 I did not pay for this beer. Pours an almost white gold colour. Where is the head... gone too soon. Smell is crappy lager smell. Taste is actually not the worst that you could imagine. Miles better than the Light. Actually has a little yeasty feel, that reminds you that you are in fact drinking a beer (with the lights it is easy to forget). Glad I had it once, but will probably never have it again.
IlanMan (850), Appleton, Wisconsin, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 |
Jan 28, 2008 Let me figure out what to write for this. It still sucks just like coors light. It only has more alcohol, no more taste. Won’t buy again. Sucked.
DrunkAsASkunk (847), Lynnwood, Washington, USA
| 1.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 6/20 |
Jul 25, 2002 Its high quality water with a little beer added to it. The appearance is dull, and they only taste good if youve been wasted on a good strong ale before you begin drinking this cheap substitute. Just make sure its cold..a warm coors is a terrible thing to taste.
Travlr (835), Washington, Washington DC, USA
| 0.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 1/10 | 2/5 | 1/20 |
Jan 3, 2009 For some reason, this was sought after when I was growing up in New York, maybe because it was hard to get east of the Rockies. Not that it is as command as the rhinovirus, there is no need to look for it any more.
unclemike (833), Ft. Riley, Kansas, USA
| 2.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 |
Aug 1, 2008 A very light beer, pretty much tasteless. It is made from good water; I just don’t know what went wrong. There is no aroma, no taste, and the appearance is that of foamy water
keepersj12 (825), Sicklerville, New Jersey, USA
| 1.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 4/20 |
May 11, 2007 What happened to this beer. When I was a kid this was so hard to get in NJ that it had a cult following. The cans had two push tabs. A little one and a big one that your thumb would get stuck in. I remember the beer as being something special. I had one after about 25 years and I guess my memory was lying. This stuff stinks.
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)