 gws57 (1151), Saint Charles, Illinois, USA
| 1.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 6/20 |
Dec 26, 2007 Had this one bottled. Can’t believe I had never had this one before. Medium yellow pour, bubbly with a thick eggshell white head. Nose of sweet malts, canned corn, and rice pudding. Equally detestable taste. Smooth, flavorless finish. Actually, in all fairness, this is better than Budweiser. Not that it matters.
ARMed (488), Garnet Valley, Pennsylvania, USA
| 1.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 5/20 |
Feb 22, 2003 Better than Coors Lite! Not a bad mass produced beer. Good for one thing, quenching thirst on a hot day.
whiterabbit81 (244), Tallahassee, Florida, USA
| 1.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 1/5 | 8/20 |
Jan 3, 2004 Updated: May 13, 2007Tried to froth it up real good, but still only got about a centimeter of froth, which disappeared within a minute. Lots of small bubbles continually circling through the semi-golden, watery-looking lager. Smell is VERY faint, but perhaps less adjuncty than other macros. Very thin body. Flavor is also faint, almost to the point of non-existance. What’s there is sweet, slightly carmely and finishes with just a touch of bitterness. I’ll give it props for its incredible smoothness and its refreshing nature. You can certainly drink a lot of these bad boys.
DragonStout (1386), Pataskala, Ohio, USA
| 1.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 |
Jul 27, 2003 All right i had to just get thru this one.Something I have had many times before being educated.Another fine example of beer flavored water.i guess with all the ads that is why it sells well.Now bring me some real brew!
Alcoholist (570), Peoria, Illinois, USA
| 1.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 |
Apr 2, 2004 Clear golden yellow with a nice white head and lacing. Good citrus hopped nose with a touch of wheat. Taste is similar to the nose but I think they used way too much Rocky Mountain water, it's just way too watered down. Still better than all the other US macros, but not by a lot.
BrewDad (2412), Olympia, Washington, USA
| 1.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 |
Jul 30, 2005 Thank you Grandpa for the taste of this beer back when I was 5. This stuff was like the worst I ever had back then and now days once ina great great great while I might have a sip just to remember when Grandpa let me have some of his beer. To you Grandpa I never look at you as a bad man. Your the one who gave me Beer!!!!
mohawksin (187), Nebraska, USA
| 1.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 |
Jun 19, 2004 Much better in the bottle than in the can. The can holds the metal flavor. Malt flavor is all I remember of this. Much better than any Miller beer.
KUEric (635), Chevy Chase, Maryland, USA
| 1.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 3/5 | 7/20 |
Aug 13, 2007 In the wedding party in Colorado. I figured when in Colorado why not ’tap the rockies’?
It’s Coors, who hasnt had it? I just wanted a story to tell when I finally rated it. And the rehersal dinner I hardly remmeber qualifies.
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)