 donteatpoop (112), Youngstown, Ohio, USA
Apr 11, 2008
Golden in color with virtually no head. Very grainy scent. Tastes of grains and sweet cereal. Carbonation is a bit high for my tastes, aftertaste is a bit on the bad side. Average drinkability, if you drink one you may as well have a few more. This is a slightly below average quality beer, not something I would drink again on purpose.
Serving type: bottle
elihapa (190), Hawaii, USA
Jul 17, 2008 This beer is inexcusable. Even its presentation is bad: dull gray-gold cans, who does that?? All this beer is is calories and a skunky metal flavor that is repulsive. Spare yourself and stay away, this beer is a drain pour even at a sloshy Frat party.
Jblauvs (100), Manchester, New Hampshire, USA
Jul 14, 2008 the Tan Can. Classic beer, with a classic cheap macro taste of metal and pee. coors light with more calories.
VacaBeerDude (19), Vacaville, California, USA
Jul 13, 2008 Just about as average and Ho-Humm as you can possibly get. If you have been working hard and you’re dripping in sweat, and this beer is ICE cold, it works well as a quick thirst quencher. I say quick because the last thing you want is to try and drink this beer after it begins to warm. NOT a beautiful thing.
johntreeter (64), Greenwood, Indiana, USA
Jul 12, 2008 Well if I was going to drink a macro lager this would be it. Typical American macro. If there is nothing there to be offensive, then there’s no way it can be.
JonR888710 (1000), Cochabamba, Bolivia
Jul 3, 2008 Very golden, like the can, with a white head like the snow of the rockies. Taste is grains and corn with slight acidicness. Wet, long ending with more malts than the others. Doesn’t have a crisp, abrupt ending. This one lingers
|
