thehoff (596) - Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA - SEP 4, 2003
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
The thought of having a Corona that is lighter than the original is almost absurd. But the Corona Light really has more flavor than Corona Extra. Although the lime is still needed this beer does have a slightly bitter taste, although metallic, without the lime.
radiomgb (2686) - Peterborough, Ontario, CANADA - AUG 29, 2003
0.8 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Gold in colour. No aroma aside from this slight skunkiness. No flavour either, wasn't expecting any anyway. Not sure that a lighter corona is even necessary. Overall, just like water.
JK (5650) - St. Louis Park, Minnesota, USA - AUG 25, 2003
1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
yellow and tasteless. Not enjoyable like he original. There just isn't anything good to say about this light beer.
obxdude10 (2262) - Pottstown, Pennsylvania, USA - AUG 24, 2003
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
If you thought Corona Extra was bad, this is worse, as most light versions of beers usually are, very skunky flavors & aroma, the lime didn't even help, the Extra is much better
thedm (5608) - Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA - AUG 21, 2003
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
This brew poured a medium head ofwhite bubbles that left a good lacing and a transparent golden wheat colored body behind. Its aroma is mildly hoppy. The flavor comes on initially strong with hops then finishes more mildly.
tallmatt67 (99) - Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA - AUG 15, 2003
3.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
(bottled). Faint grainy aroma. Pale straw and brilliantly clear. Very thin bodied with nice corn flavor, virtually no bitterness except for the very high carbonation bite. Suprisingly, quite palatable, especially if you're dehydrated after, say, mowing the lawn. After all, we are rating the beer for it's qualities and how it fits its style, not its marketing, right?
gord (36) - harbour grace, Newfoundland, CANADA - AUG 13, 2003
2.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
i truly don't understand all the low ratings on corona light.i find this one of the better lighter beers i ever had. i find it has a nice taste for a lighter beer for lighter beer usually has no taste at all.i would'nt say it's the best brew i ever had but it's a lot better than people say it is.
jskendzel (602) - Washington DC, USA - AUG 12, 2003
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
I actually didn't taste any significant deviation in flavor from the typical Corona. Clear bottles, what are they thinking?
SudsMaster (68) - Denville, New Jersey, USA - AUG 6, 2003
1.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
WHY? WHY? DEAR GOD WHY?
If you desperate for a smaller ass, thats the only reason to drink this crap.
ElGaucho (2388) - Minnetonka, Minnesota, USA - AUG 4, 2003
2.7 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 10/20
Very noticeable dry yeast/lager aroma. Light gold in body with lots of visible carbonation and a white head, which is small and somewhat lasting. Very light flavor but with some bite. Just had Michelob Golden Draft Light and this one has less flavor. Very drinkable but a little bland.