MrGregAD199 (65) - Medford, Oregon, USA - DEC 26, 2002
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
psychodrama311 (122) - petaluma, Nevada, USA - DEC 20, 2002
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
crazy horse.. makes you crazy. first beer i bought was just for the decorative bottle. got me hooked for like two weeks. than i moved on to real malt liquor. nothing bad about it..except itís a bad taste..bad aftertaste. bad aroma. good head change.
Supaflyfresh99 (98) - E.Williston, New York, USA - NOV 30, 2002
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
This was good to get a buzz on on the train ride into the city
pympynaynteazy99 (31) - South San Jose, California, USA - OCT 31, 2002
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Uggggh! Once in high school I thought it would be good to mix Crazy Horse and MD 20/20. BAD MISTAKE! This stuff tastes like SHIT, but it does get you RETARDED DRUNK. Anyone over 18 that drinks this stuff should be embarassed and ashamed.
FORTY DOGG (22) - Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, USA - OCT 11, 2002
4.3 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 18/20
When I Reminice about drinking this shit Back in the Day, I tend to recall Three wonderfull traits about this Highly revered Malt Liquor, First, The truely splended bottle labeling, (perhaps the most beautiful beverage container since the Jack Daniels bottles), Second, the poor taste, and Third, the high alchol content, Simply a classic whose loss is still deeply mourned by thousands of Gen-Xers who occasionlly recall their early 90s High School days of gettin BENT! Crazy Horse, after a heroic effort, eventually changed the label on their bottles to finally quiet some Whiney, Politically Correct, Liberal, Do-Gooder, RedSkins who were complaining that the bottle íStereotypedí them, boo hoo hoo. Well the ugly new bottle, while still Crazy Horse on the inside, just was not the same anymore and a lot of people turned up their noses at it. RIP
crazyhorse99 (1) - USA - AUG 30, 2002 does not count
4.4 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 18/20
I miss the liquid crack and want it back.
Jfishback13 (275) - Royal Oak, Michigan, USA - JUL 21, 2002
0.6 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Terrible. OE and Colt 45 go down like chinese silk compared to this stuff. This sludge kills ones internal organs. I watched food I hadnít eaten in days magically appear again as if by David Copperfield himself. It was half the price of ípremiumí malt liquors, but please, do yourself and society a favor... go donate plasma if you have to, but donít get stuck with this swill in your gut. P.S. The wide mouth 40 bottle looked neat.
mwsf (360) - San Francisco, California, USA - JUN 19, 2002
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
This got a 5 on appearance just for the super-cool bottle. Otherwise, it tastes like a crappy american lager with a shot of bad vodka dropped into it. Drink at your own peril.
qwikstreet (43) - Pennsylvania, USA - MAY 10, 2002
3.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 19/20
UPDATED: OCT 8, 2003 Very disgusting, but got me through high school. Scores high for getting you drunk as hell. I can never find a 40 of this anymore.
naes66699 (18) - USA - APR 23, 2002
5 AROMA 10/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 20/20
simply a classic.