Aaza (3) - , - NOV 1, 2008
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
another bland nz beer, sells well in the summer at super markets, one for the youngsters. btw was 4.5% a few years back.how db can still call this export is beyond me.
DonNZ (1) - - OCT 7, 2013 does not count
1.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Bland as all hell. Virtually no head. Watery and tasteless, this beer goes down very easy so it’s probably only good if you are a raging alcoholic. If you like tasty beer, my advice is to avoid.
yungbeerguy (31) - NEW ZEALAND - SEP 7, 2013
3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
A good beer, good job mourten coutts this beer is malty and slightly gassy but make for a good drink.
Oakes (11031) - Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA - MAY 10, 2013
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Dull straw, no head, looks terrible. Smells like celery and gasoline. Maltesque palate, some plastic stuff...would ve at home in the Molson pantheon.
lisagirl (262) - Christchurch, NEW ZEALAND - APR 25, 2013
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
a little banana wheatiness as below but otherwise nothingness. just metallic water as usual.
DylansDad (290) - NEW ZEALAND - APR 14, 2013
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Aroma has hints of banana just peeking over the typical macro lager aromas of despair, which did pique my interest for a nano-second. Then down the hatch we go and the first few gulps are inoffensive and would probably be refreshing on a hot day, but by the time I get halfway into the glass, the taste of vegetable cooking oil, and oversweet metallic finish start drowning out any goodness this beer might once have had.
monobrow (7) - Wanganui, NEW ZEALAND - JAN 19, 2013 does not count
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Bland lager which is refreshing & easy to guzzle down if it’s really cold . Little flavour of much except quite sweet . No head. Drank it from 330 ml bottle , but have had it on tap & can before. I’ve had worse, better than Rhenick from memory.
danielyabu (987) - União da Vitória, BRAZIL - APR 29, 2012
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
small frothy white head. fair lacing. fully diminishing. clear thin dark yellow body. aroma moderate hoppy, light yeasty, honey. if: moderate sweet lighty bitter. ff: light sweet bitter; average duration. palate: light medium body, watery texture, metallic finish. dulçor de mel permeado por amargor metalizado; leve adstringência final surge como defeito, nenhum diferencial 7 s
Davros (1723) - Melbourne, AUSTRALIA - MAR 2, 2012
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Pours gold with a small, lasting head.
Nose shows hay, vegetal notes, sweet malt and cereal grains. Also some faint floral notes.
Similar flavours, more hay and vegetal characters. Again, there’s a faint floral note.
Body is a bit watery.
Baz7778 (58) - SCOTLAND - FEB 23, 2012
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Nothing much to say about nothing here, life’s to short for a beer this poor
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
deusax (413) - Grenoble, FRANCE - FEB 14, 2012
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
UPDATED: MAY 23, 2012 Bottled. Gold beer, soft sparkling, no bitterness, a bit of sweetiness. Strong matly taste. Not really interesting