RateBeer
overall
48
48
style
Brewed by Brouwerij De Koninck (Duvel-Moortgat)
Style: Belgian Ale
Antwerpen, Belgium

bottled
common

on tap
common

Broad Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 951   WEIGHTED AVG: 3.07   EST. CALORIES: 156   ABV: 5.2%
Share this beer with friends!
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Filtered, pasteurised and carbonated in bottles. Filtered and carbonated on tap in Antwerp.


3.9
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 5/5   OVERALL 15/20
AceOfHearts (1374) - Mountain View, California, USA - NOV 4, 2002
RE-RATE: Rich-looking brown pour fading into a clean amber. Chewy mouthfeel. strong apple in the smell and taste. This would be a good everyday beer...onot too complex but still damn good. Slight bit of tobacco flavor in the finish. ORIGINAL RATING 8-4-8-4-15 4/14/2002: Fruity, hoppy taste. Pretty average as far as Belgians go.

4
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 17/20
delacerveza (157) - Florida, USA - OCT 27, 2002
had this on tap ordered as "bolleke"...lovely burnished copper brightness, fresh aroma. nice spiced baked apple flavor. quite tasty.

2.1
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 7/20
BillKismet (3295) - Seattle, Washington, USA - OCT 23, 2002
Another seemingly overrated Belgian Ale. The appearance is pleasant enough--healthy bronze hue and a bit over-carbonated with a ring of big bubbles on top. The smell is redolent of the HoH rainforest: damn pine with a prickle of urine. Despite, this initial reaction, I resumed my investigation. The body is of damp pine, watery, insubstantial mouthfeel with a little twinge on the bacl of the palate that instantly subsides. The body is reminiscent of busch beer--this beer is like a belgian ale meets american standard. No wonder why this stuff was so modestly priced.

2.6
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 11/20
muzzlehatch (4424) - Burlington, Vermont, USA - OCT 20, 2002
Certainly not impossible that my sample was touched in some way; but I had it on tap at the Map Room, an establishment known for the quality of its service and beer-keeping; so... this was pretty bad. Like a second-rate Orval, all bitterness and dryness but little real flavor. Decent aroma and body, nice head, but this was really hard to put down. Luckily better brews were in store for me..

3.9
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 16/20
duff (5484) - Copenhagen, DENMARK - SEP 28, 2002
RE-rate:Love this stuff, spicy, peppery, with a dry yeast character, on the drier side of the scale, silkTork is totally right, this stuff grows on you, bigtime, and i reckon its great from the bottle, aswell as the tap, very Belgian. Makes me want to go back to Antwerp.

3
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 12/20
SilkTork (5123) - Rochester, Kent, United Kingdom, Kent, ENGLAND - SEP 27, 2002
UPDATED: OCT 19, 2005 Sept, 2002. Pasteurised bottle. This is a strange bastard - lager with a tea bag? Mmmm. Made with pilsner ingredients and then lagered it should be a lager - Vienna style perhaps. But the yeast that Van den Bogaert keeps a secret ferments at a higher temperature than other lagers, thus producing a very unique ale. The triple application of the Saaz hops also adds an extremely fragrant and loooooong finish. Itís a strange beast indeed this ale - the slightly heady and honey sweet nose is in marked contrast to the light and subtle body, and is light years away from that dry and delicious finish. I didnít like this at first. I was confused about what I was drinking. I had heard that it was only good on draught in Antwerp. I was prepared to sweep it aside. Subsequent tastings, however, have been better. The hops have grown on me. [3.0]

3
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 12/20
Ungstrup (28458) - Citizen of the universe, DENMARK - SEP 23, 2002
A beer with a nice amber color but almost no head. It has a nice but not recognicable aroma, it reminds me a little of Brooklyn Lager. It has a nice rounded sweet flavor of good malt blend - Iíll guess it contains some Munchner malt. It ends of on a very slightly bitter note - of a great tasting hop. An OK beer.

3.3
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 14/20
Tom Servo (424) - Arlington, Virginia, USA - SEP 20, 2002
Probably better on tap, but the bottle isnít so bad either. Has a cider quality to it. Must admit Iím not the biggest belgian fan, but this is okay.

3.8
   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 14/20
eczematic (1307) - Sydney, AUSTRALIA - SEP 6, 2002
I agree with Caesar, this one is fantastic on tap. Really crappy in the bottle though. Drink it in Antwerp! rerate 9/02: well itís not that astounding but itís still subtly toasty and nutty and well balanced and goes down nicely on an outdoor seat in an antwerp pub.

3.5
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 15/20
neilrichards (191) - Leicestershire, ENGLAND - SEP 4, 2002
pretty good.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page   1 « 87 88 89  90  91 92 93 » 96


Tick this beer

for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2014,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50