Drinkingdan (375) - East Norriton, Pennsylvania, USA - FEB 28, 2002
3.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 16/20
It had me from the first taste. Very crisp. A must try.
Trappist (284) - Knoxville, Tennessee, USA - FEB 27, 2002
3.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
I bought this beer at my local pub, because the first thought that ran threw my mind was ’What the hell is a Blackened Voodoo?’ Well I soon found out that it was a middle of the road type brew if even that, and that I think the name is made to draw you in to a bad beer! One Was enough because I really just did not care for it!
SudsMaster (68) - Denville, New Jersey, USA - FEB 17, 2002
3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Bought this beer on a whim. It’s a smooth malty brew, but doesn’t taste like something called blackened vodoo should. Not bad overall.
Drew (2411) - Kent, Ohio, USA - FEB 13, 2002
3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
very malty. very low hop flavor. not much carbonation. much smoother than i expected, but after the second bottle i was ready for a change - just got too malty/sweet. could use some roasting!
Aurelius (4379) - Tallahassee, Florida, USA - JAN 25, 2002
3.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Hoppy, molasses nose. Virtually no head, but good carbonation. Dry-hoppy, patent malt, acidic and dry. Good beer, but by no means worth the (ahem) $8.99 asked for it at the local chain liquor store. Lousy label.
Swordmyst (12) - Herndon, Virginia, USA - JAN 24, 2002
3.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
For all its color it leaves a little to be desired. Years ago it was a favorite of mine, now it leaves quite a bit to hope for.
MilkmanDan (1943) - Eagan, Minnesota, USA - JAN 17, 2002
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Dark beer my fanny. None of the richness or kick you’d expect. Basically a serviceable lager with some dark food coloring. OK, there are some roasted malts and caramel in the taste, but it’s just not very impressive.
foduck (330) - Denton, Texas, USA - JAN 10, 2002
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
UPDATED: DEC 23, 2004 Smooth and easy drinking, nothing special. Not enough flavor for a Schwarzbier, could use more chocolate malt and malt in general. Definitely clean tasting as a lager should be but a bit too thin to be impressive. Re-rate: there’s a certain unpleasant sourness in this that I don’t enjoy.
MOboy (505) - Kansas City, Missouri, USA - JAN 5, 2002
3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
UPDATED: SEP 23, 2009 Tea brown body with a thin, short lived foam. The aroma is dominated by bubblegum and cheap milk chocolate. The flavor is also of bubblegum, dark fruit, chocolate and slight caramel. Very smooth texture with a nice level of carbonation. This is almost like a lager/English ale hybrid.
TheDean (786) - MIlwaukee, Wisconsin, USA - DEC 30, 2001
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Somewhat of a letdown. Somewhat bland for a dark beer with a bit of aftertaste that was not the most appleasing.