superspak (2117) - Michigan, USA - NOV 19, 2012
3.6 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
12 ounce bottle into signature pint glass, bottled on 4/4/2012. Pours lightly hazy golden amber color with a 1-2 finger foamy white head with poor retention, that reduces to a thin cap that lingers. Minimal spotty lacing clings to the glass. Aromas of huge honey, tart strawberry, apple cider, pear, light caramel, light bread, and a touch of raspberry. Very nice aromas with good strength and balance. Taste of honey, strawberry, pear, apple cider, wheat, floral, herbal, earth, and light tart raspberry. Zero bitterness; with lingering notes of honey, strawberry, pear, apple, raspberry, and herbal on the finish for a short bit. Good flavor balance, with a fair amount of flavors and decent complexity; quite dry on the finish with zero cloying sweetness. Medium carbonation and body; with a lightly syrupy and crisp mouthfeel that is good. Alcohol is very well hidden with only a slight warming noticed after the finish. Overall this is a pretty nice gluten free sorghum beer. A fair amount of nice flavors with decent balance; and extremely smooth to drink. This was pretty enjoyable stuff.
GreatDane1632 (130) - Louisiana, USA - MAR 2, 2014
3.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
Catching up on some old ratings from Untappd -- First rated on 13 July 2013. Not usually a fan of fruit beers, but this one is quite good.
krompt (611) - - FEB 24, 2014
3.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Incredibly underrated. How can this score so low? You people need to take a long hard look at yourselves in the mirror. Then punch the mirror right where your nose would be. The mirror will break and you will have seven years of bad luck. You did it to yourself because you have unresolved anger issues.
sjohnny (332) - - FEB 23, 2014
1.9 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Predominately strawberries with some yeast. Pours clear cidery gold with a thin quickly fading bright white head. Tastes like a combination of Hawaiian Punch and old woman make-up. Not bad enough to pour out but I won't be finishing the four pack.
sfontain (760) - Columbus, Ohio, USA - FEB 21, 2014
1.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Single bottle $2.29 from Kroger, Bridge St. Horribly fizzy, instantly disappearing tan head; copper pour. Aroma sweet, molasses, syrup, tangy, butterscotch. Flavor... ew. It’s starts of a little cider-like, but the flavor is just plain odd; tangy, molasses. Thin body. Not a fan of this at all.
Rperez (90) - Florida, USA - FEB 18, 2014
2.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Im glad I'm not gluten intolerant, its a decent try to make an interesting beer but its just not that good, too fruity and overly crisp, not for me
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
Tonkun (584) - New Jersey, USA - FEB 4, 2014
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
Bottle. Light amber pour with a bit of white head. Berries, honey, syrup, wheat. Body is boring. Light body with short finish. Not excited about this
blklab2007 (1859) - Connecticut, USA - FEB 2, 2014
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Bottle poured a very light amber color with a ring of white head on the glass. Aroma has berry, malt, and grains. Mouth feel is light and the carbonation medium low. Flavor has berry but it is not very pleasant mixed in with the honey and grains. Not my cup of tea.
ABUSEDGOAT (2267) - California, USA - FEB 1, 2014
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Clear yellow color, moderate to small head, some lace/retention. Aroma is cherry, non malt crap, honey. Light bodied, moderate to low sweetness, lightly tart. zzzzzzzzz
GarrettB (897) - San Diego, California, USA - JAN 29, 2014
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 13/20
June 1st, 2012 - I was a little shocked to pull up the Ratebeer profile on Dogfish Head’s Tweason’Ale, only to discover that it had been roundly thrashed by reviewers. Dogfish Head has both its fans and its critics, but a weighted average of 2.59 seemed something more of a condemnation than a nuanced appraisal of a creative beer. What explained this pan-community beer crusade against the Tweason? Before reviewing the reviews, I decided to practice an attempt at unbiased evaluation based on my notes. The smell, according to my notes, is deeply fruity, and practically dripping with strawberry and the deep flavor of artificial cherry flavors, often found in candies and pastries. The flavor is more balanced, with a soda like consistency (blech) and a short aftertaste. The very beginning of the sip exhibits a heavy hit of the freshest strawberry flavor I’ve ever encountered in a beer, but the rest is wanting. So, how did my notes compare with the Ratebeer hive mind? Well, I guess this is sorghum beer. Discrimination against this class of brew might explain part of it. Others thought it was boring (I agree) and some saw it as a novel experiment, but one not destined to be repeated. Fair enough.
arkurzynski (1369) - West Bend, Wisconsin, USA - JAN 26, 2014
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Pale amber pour. Nose of strawberry with light cream/vanilla, and a bit of wet musty maltiness. Flavor is light strawberry with hint of vanilla sweetness that ends with some watery tart green apple and wet malt. Clean. A touch medicinal. Not nearly as bad as what I was expecting from the reviews. A decent sorghum beer.