Serve in Snifter, Tulip


on tap

Broad Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 2343   WEIGHTED AVG: 4.01   EST. CALORIES: 336   ABV: 11.2%
Share this beer with friends!
This is a lacerative muther of a beer. The evil big brother of Arrogant Bastard Ale. It is strongly suggested you stay far, far away from this beer. Those foolish enough to venture close enough to taste will experience a punishingly unforgiving assault on the palate. íCourse thereís always the masochists...
Note: 2007 - 10%, 2008 & 2009 - 10.5%, 2010 - 11.2%, 2011 - 10.5%, 2012 - 11.2%.

   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 9/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 18/20
obxdude10 (2043) - Limerick, Pennsylvania, USA - JAN 24, 2003
Pretty damn good beer, the aromas were filled with heavy hoppiness & floral tones, along with a syrup-like hint, the color was of a dark amber, this beer didn't have all that much head, it just pretty much fizzled out very quickly to just a rim around the edge of the beer, the flavors were pretty well balanced, and in accordinace with Stone's lineup the beer was very heavily hopped, dry & bitter aftertaste, all-around a very excellent beer experience

   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 16/20
drismyhero (815) - Tacoma, Washington, USA - JAN 20, 2003
UPDATED: FEB 9, 2003 My only qualm with this beer is that...more is not always better. It is an American Strong ale, and it is an American tendency to want more more more, but when it comes down to it, balance is what really makes a beer good. Although a bit unbalanced, this beer is very tasty and very rich. TONS of barley here, but vanilla and sugar overtones make it rather appealing. There is a bit of an astringent smell, but it's hardly detectable underneath all the barley. Hops take back seat to the huge malt here - very earthy - dingy and sugary, soothing and bewildering all at the same time.

   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 18/20
Pjones6738 (500) - Madison, Wisconsin, USA - JAN 19, 2003
Wow...thats some good stuff. Hoppy scent, but an almost chocolatey taste. Words can't do it justice.

   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 11/20
Ernest (6215) - Boulder, Colorado, USA - JAN 19, 2003
UPDATED: DEC 24, 2007 2007 bottle. Head is initially small, frothy, light brown, mostly diminishing. Body is medium to dark amber. Aroma is lightly to moderately malty (caramel), lightly to moderately hoppy (pine, grapefruit), with notes of sherry, paper, and alcohol. Flavor is heavily sweet, lightly acidic, lightly to moderately bitter. Finish is moderately sweet, lightly acidic, moderately to heavily bitter. Medium to full body, syrupy texture, lively/soft carbonation, moderately alcoholic. Man...this was a 4+ beer back in the day, only about 3 years ago. The 2006 batch dropped the ball for me to the tune of 3.3. This yearís is even worse...itís like theyíre not even trying anymore. Clumsy and dull aroma, syrupy sweet mess of a mouth experience. Such a shame.

   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 15/20
snoot (286) - Anaheim, California, USA - JAN 18, 2003
The alcohol overpowers the other flavors...could be a great beer if it blended into the other flavors better. 2002 Edition.

   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 16/20
brewbandit (312) - Marietta, Georgia, USA - JAN 17, 2003
For a big brother to the arrogant Bastard, this one is much more balanced and very drinkable. I am becoming sort of a hophead and I have Stone to thank for directing me in that direction. The beer has a nice amber brown richness with a gentle hop nose. a well balanced bitterness that leaves you wanting more. If you can get up to go to the frig for another one!

   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 16/20
muzzlehatch (4424) - Burlington, Vermont, USA - JAN 14, 2003
Great transparent blood color, largish immediately dying fizzy head; aroma of smoke, butterscotch, cherries, pinecone-hops. Oakes has it right on the thickness; this is probably the heaviest non-Imperial stout Iíve had, extremely full and intense. Alcohol is a little too evident here for me, detracting somewhat from the otherwise well-balanced fruity/vanilla/caramel flavor profile. Hops strongly in evidence, with a nice long twang at the end. AB is right, this IS a bit too much -- but not in the hops, rather the alcohol. Good, but I think I prefer the "liíl brother".

   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 5/5   OVERALL 17/20
Zach Diesel (906) - Sisters, Oregon, USA - JAN 12, 2003
venomous aroma, deadly currant bitterness that lasts forever

   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 17/20
666seth (222) - California, USA - JAN 10, 2003
Though one! Deep amber in color, strong malty aroma with a bitter hoppy sweet malty flavor. Though you can taste the alcohol it doesnít distract too much

   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 15/20
HH (165) - Everett, Washington, USA - JAN 10, 2003
Hmm.. Gorgeous color, deep mahogony/red. Head did not stick around long. Seemed to lack the hop assault of the regular Bastard. Maybe Iím just turning into a hophead. Overall a very decent brew. Recommend.

We Want To Hear From You

Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »

Page  1 « 223 224 225  226  227 228 229 » 235

Tick this beer

for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2014,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
about us
About RateBeer
New Beers
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50