mexicanese70 (5) - los angeles, California, USA - SEP 8, 2008
2.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
not bad, but i’ve had way better. i didn’t think they still made this until i got some the other day. i remember it being way better than it was
KAggie97 (3530) - Ugly, Hot, and Humid Spring, Texas, USA - APR 29, 2005
0.6 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Pours thin and lifeless. Taste is like a barnyard, with lots of straw and animal dung. The hops are flat, the malt is raw, and everything else in this screams awful. Iím reminded of cooked beets while drinking this. Not suitable for anyone... except Will Smith.
MrBeerUSA (40) - HorseShoe, North Carolina, USA - MAY 28, 2004
0.8 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
Oh No!, they donít make this muck anymore?! Darn, shucks, crap, holy-cannoli! That is such a shame, if anyone ever liked this beer I feel bad.......GOOD
crazyvin (1692) - New York, USA - JAN 8, 2004
3.4 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 15/20
poured a clear reddish color with a very thin tan head. Aroma was sweet and malty. The was deffinitally a caramel presence in its aroma. Taste was light, almost delicate with a nice hoppy twang in the finish.
jazz88 (2466) - San Francisco, California, USA - JAN 8, 2003
3.4 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Bottle. What an interesting find in a small liquor store in Menlo Park, CA. How this beer ended up here I have no idea. A cloudy amber color with a tan head. Lots of caramel in the malty nose. A little tangy zest on the palate. Pretty good stuff.