1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
0,5l can. Pale yellow color. Medium white head appears, only to disappear quickly. Watery, very faint malty aroma. Corn, malty, watery, woody in flavor. Never again.
1.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
500ml can (Rimi, Tallinn)
Aroma is ______ (insert words later if some aroma appears). Maybe a hint of something medicinal or menthol. Maybe that was one of our socks. Some ok retronasals, a little estery. However, on swallowing it’s utterly awful. Chemical and astringent. I want to scrape my tongue. Very shitty lager. About what I expect from Van Pur.
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Rated: 26.07.2007
Bottle green, 660 ml
Appearance: Head is rocky white, head size is initially huge but systematically, quite quickly diminishing, head lacing is fair, head is mostly diminishing. Body is golden even amber, not perfectly transparent and clear and sparkling very gentle.
Aroma: Hoppy, a bit skunky (but only hints due to green bottle), chalky, mineral nose but weak, malts in aroma are not much preceptable, plain, strait rather poor, typical boring aroma, nothing extraordinary, a hint of old grease, no alcohol hints.
Flavour: Front is sweet and wattery, like water with sugar, than you can feel again sweetness on palate that becomes stronger and made your tongue dry and sticky, it is a big mistake to add an extra sugar to the beer and call it on etiquete ’Pilsener’. Finish is moderate sweet and short. Nothing interesting, very watered hops and malts.
Palate: Body is light ot medium, texture is wattery, tongue is dry at finish in a nasty way. Carbonation on palate is almost flat, finish is a bit chalky, parched and nothing more of a taste, only negative aspects. The worst beer should follow that particular one should not be worser and the sad story is, that there are some worser one.
|
