hayduke (3775) - Eureka, California, USA - MAY 7, 2008
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
From a 12 oz bottle this poured a liight gold with a fizzy white head and mot much lacing. Nose of corn and not much else. Very mild mouthfeel. Flavor of sweet corn. No finish. Better than Corona, but not by much.
RichardGretton (4434) - Leicestershire, ENGLAND - APR 22, 2008
2.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Bottle. Golden lager with a reasonable head. The aroma is very yeasty and the flavour is dry, yeasty and quite watery. Overall a basic beer.
Russo (1902) - Hemhofen, Baden-Württemberg, GERMANY - MAR 14, 2008
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
UPDATED: JUL 3, 2009 Bottled (Thanks Soni!). pale yellow color with a nice and persistent cream, aroma is hopy and malty, the flavor is refreshing, mouthfeel is bitter.
Português: Cerveja clara com uma boa formação de espuma duradoura, aroma de lúpulo e malte, o sabor é refrescante, retrogosto amargo.
Beerlando (3342) - Orlando, Florida, USA - JAN 30, 2008
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 8/20
Ugh. Received a sixer as a "gift". Tried one and gave the other 5 away. Pours a very pale gold with a fizzy, pure white head. Minimal lacing noted. The aroma was of straw and light, skunky corn malts. The flavor followed suit, Pure wet grain and sweet corn. Watery body, with a sharp, grassy, astringent finish. Horrible beer. Drain pour.
aubreya (676) - Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA - JAN 29, 2008
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
The color was pale yellow. The head was thin, fizzy, and white. The aroma was skunky, and corny. The flavor was bran, skunky, and corny. The palate was thin and the finish, abrupt.
llbjr77 (89) - Largo, Florida, USA - JAN 9, 2008
2.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Not bad for a lager. Great for a summertime thirst. Can taste a liitle hops, but overall very light in color and taste. Not bad.
Acarotibia (55) - Santiago de Compostela, SPAIN - JAN 9, 2008
2.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Clear colour, and soft foam.
Not a bad beer for a cheap price.
A pale lager beer with a very low filter.
Curiosity: Because of its low production, it is better to drink it in winter because the worst part of the production is sold on summer (much more demmand and colder beers).
00cobraR (1103) - Greensboro, North Carolina, USA - DEC 11, 2007
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Not bad. I enjoyed this one. Aroma was grassy and grainy. Flavor was very much the same with a nice little hop smack to it. Over all a rather refreshing beer.
AmazonMatt (285) - PANAMA - NOV 26, 2007
3.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
I haven’t tried a non-Panamanian pale lager in some time, as I am still stuck here in Panama with no new beers. Saw this as the store, and it was a label that I haven’t tried yet. Not bad for a pale lager, actually. I found it fresh and with no adjuncts. It was good cold, I finished the whole bottle,which doesn’t always happen with the pale lagers. It warmed up quite a bit and it still tastes good with no foulness. I’d buy again, easily! I’m going to rate this as the pale lager that it is!
Embrouille (2831) - SWITZERLAND - NOV 18, 2007
2.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Bottled in a nice place in Baden, Switzerland. It pours a yellow beer with a small white head. There is a nice bite to the taste. Rather interesting. Decently bitter with a nice hint of chestnuts. Quite malty; lots of cereals in the taste too. Rather enjoyable. A lager I would definately purchase again.