1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20 KAggie97 (3285) - Ugly, Hot, and Humid Spring, USA - MAY 26, 2005
Smells and tastes like diet amber. This beer has almost no pizazz and no character. Faint malt is hidden by tangy water. Why am I drinking this? Oh yeah, ’cause I bought it. Avoid this brewer.
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20 dlihcsnatas (56) - Texas, USA - JUN 14, 2008
Nice amber/red color with a very strong malty aroma. The flavor is that of amber malts with just enough hops to create a balanced flavor. Nothing really that notable about this brew, good or bad. Just a blah brew that could use just a little something to make it notable.
1.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20 mjg74 (2139) - La Mesa, California, USA - DEC 11, 2006
Bottle from Vons. Light brownish pour. Kind of like watered down Coke. The aroma is of burnt corn flakes. Sweet and somewhat sour corny flavors. Very caramelized flavors. Tastes like food coloring and seltzer water.
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20 SDalkoholic (1536) - Chula Vista, California, USA - DEC 3, 2006
Bought in a mixed 6 pack from Vons: I was easily fooled into thinking this brwery was a microbrewery out of Eureka California because of the label and design of a gold digger. But, its a macro company out of the snowy cold place where gold does not exsist. Very bland and coming up empty. Loser of the bunch.
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20 lusitania (10) - Texas, USA - AUG 25, 2005
Everything about this beer is weak. One of the other reviewers put it best when they called it diet amber. Very poor head. Drinkable, although barely.
2.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20 prpplague (247) - Euless, Texas, USA - NOV 15, 2004
weak head with a weak ,kinda skunky, aroma. flavor was average with kinda malty hints, and just a hint of hops. very average
2.7 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 12/20 grat (433) - ST. Louis, Missouri, USA - JUL 9, 2004
are we certain that this is an amber ale because I really really want to put this in the same ctageory as something like killians. This was as far as I am concerned a hoppier version of Killians with a way more crappy pale lager mouthfeel. Sucked
g-rat
1.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20 jschlunt (8) - Los Angeles, California, USA - JUN 3, 2003 does not count
Just an average beer. Too much of a malty flavor for my tastes. I wouldn't recommend this beer.
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20 21iceman40 (1732) - vienna, West Virginia, USA - MAY 2, 2003
How does this get such a high rating, maybe everyone was high when they had this. A hint of malt is pushed to the background by loads of rice and metal. Smelled much like one part beer, 8 parts water, and tasted pretty much the same. Keep up the good work gluek, you are not straying from your high standards of sucking.
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20 foduck (328) - Denton, Texas, USA - MAR 21, 2003
UPDATED: APR 18, 2007 Appearance was lacking, no head. Malt aroma. Pretty much just malt taste, palate is a little weak. Not a bad beer but could use a touch more of hops.
|