2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20 BillKismet (3000) - Seattle, Washington, USA - APR 25, 2002
Semi-healthy bronze appearance in this lager which exudes an aroma characterized by indiscernable spice notes. This is a medium to full bodied lager, again, with pungent spicy components that I fail to pinpoint. Still, no mystery that this lager is mediocre.
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20 jazz88 (2465) - San Francisco, California, USA - AUG 4, 2002
Bottle. A golden yellow color with a dry crisp lager taste.
3.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20 joet (1919) - Santa Rosa, California, USA - JUL 21, 2001
Deep golden color and quick but full head with no lacing. A cute sweet nose and a modest balanced fuller light bodied beer. Way better than Gatorade on a hot day.
3.7 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20 philbertk (1873) - Seattle, Washington, USA - FEB 9, 2010
Minnesota Brewing Company--Three Monkey’s Brewing Company --Fat Weasel Lager--2000 Release--12 oz. Bottle--5.50% ABV. (3.75 / 5.0) Pale Lager. Rich clear golden color. Light fruit front with malty lager aroma. Rich laced malty ale like body with light smooth lager flavor. Hints of buttery caramel malt. Ends smooth with minor spice. Sampled 5/31/2000.
2.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 9/20 Sickboy282 (1115) - San Diego, California, USA - APR 9, 2002
UPDATED: JUN 16, 2004 I don't like lagers too much, so I won't comment.
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20 IslandHaole (1083) - Yokosuka-Shi, Kanagawa-Ken, JAPAN - JUL 19, 2002
Certainly at a level above the Yellow fuzzies, perhaps a stepping stone into micros for the uncultured palates of the masses. It’s not bad......for a lager.
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20 stchloe (691) - Portland, Oregon, USA - AUG 11, 2009
Eww gross, completly bland and just blase. Its brewed for TJ, so what can you expect. There just isn’t much there.
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20 Alcoholist (570) - Peoria, Illinois, USA - JAN 20, 2004
Disappointing after their Ale. Slightly better than average lager flavor.
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20 weeicemon (126) - Lancaster, California, USA - MAR 20, 2001
Fake,quickly dissapating,artificial head. Golden color doesnt mask the pale flavor.It’s not as though it’s made with poor ingredients but that the brewer elected to go down a cheaper path with the essentials.
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20 Diego (79) - San Diego, California, USA - SEP 26, 2002
Not bad...Not really good. The nose wasn’t spectacular and the flavor left me wanting a tad more.
|